From 43f6de7986407cb15b5b39b18eb59d19d0abfd20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Asperti <andrea.asperti@unibo.it>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:42:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] trans_step.ma

---
 matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/compare.ma | 91 +++++++++----------
 .../matita/lib/turing/universal/trans_step.ma | 52 +++++++++++
 .../matita/lib/turing/universal/uni_step.ma   | 13 +--
 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/trans_step.ma

diff --git a/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/compare.ma b/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/compare.ma
index 1db3089cc..82044e689 100644
--- a/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/compare.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/compare.ma
@@ -27,17 +27,22 @@ include "turing/while_machine.ma".
 
 definition atm_states ≝ initN 3.
 
+definition atm0 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 0 (leb_true_to_le 1 3 (refl …)).
+definition atm1 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 1 (leb_true_to_le 2 3 (refl …)).
+definition atm2 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 2 (leb_true_to_le 3 3 (refl …)).
+
+
 definition atmr_step ≝ 
   λalpha:FinSet.λtest:alpha→bool.
   mk_TM alpha atm_states
   (λp.let 〈q,a〉 ≝ p in
    match a with
-   [ None ⇒ 〈1, None ?〉
+   [ None ⇒ 〈atm1, None ?〉
    | Some a' ⇒ 
      match test a' with
-     [ true ⇒ 〈1,None ?〉
-     | false ⇒ 〈2,Some ? 〈a',R〉〉 ]])
-  O (λx.notb (x == 0)).
+     [ true ⇒ 〈atm1,None ?〉
+     | false ⇒ 〈atm2,Some ? 〈a',R〉〉 ]])
+  atm0 (λx.notb (x == atm0)).
 
 definition Ratmr_step_true ≝ 
   λalpha,test,t1,t2.
@@ -54,43 +59,46 @@ definition Ratmr_step_false ≝
 lemma atmr_q0_q1 :
   ∀alpha,test,ls,a0,rs. test a0 = true → 
   step alpha (atmr_step alpha test)
-    (mk_config ?? 0 (midtape … ls a0 rs)) =
-  mk_config alpha (states ? (atmr_step alpha test)) 1
+    (mk_config ?? atm0 (midtape … ls a0 rs)) =
+  mk_config alpha (states ? (atmr_step alpha test)) atm1
     (midtape … ls a0 rs).
-#alpha #test #ls #a0 #ts #Htest normalize >Htest %
+#alpha #test #ls #a0 #ts #Htest whd in ⊢ (??%?); 
+whd in match (trans … 〈?,?〉); >Htest %
 qed.
      
 lemma atmr_q0_q2 :
   ∀alpha,test,ls,a0,rs. test a0 = false → 
   step alpha (atmr_step alpha test)
-    (mk_config ?? 0 (midtape … ls a0 rs)) =
-  mk_config alpha (states ? (atmr_step alpha test)) 2
+    (mk_config ?? atm0 (midtape … ls a0 rs)) =
+  mk_config alpha (states ? (atmr_step alpha test)) atm2
     (mk_tape … (a0::ls) (option_hd ? rs) (tail ? rs)).
-#alpha #test #ls #a0 #ts #Htest normalize >Htest cases ts //
+#alpha #test #ls #a0 #ts #Htest whd in ⊢ (??%?); 
+whd in match (trans … 〈?,?〉); >Htest cases ts //
 qed.
 
 lemma sem_atmr_step :
   ∀alpha,test.
   accRealize alpha (atmr_step alpha test) 
-    2 (Ratmr_step_true alpha test) (Ratmr_step_false alpha test).
-#alpha #test *
+    atm2 (Ratmr_step_true alpha test) (Ratmr_step_false alpha test).
+#alpha #test cut (∀P:Prop.atm1 = atm2 →P) [#P normalize #Hfalse destruct] #Hfalse
+*
 [ @(ex_intro ?? 2)
-  @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? 1 (niltape ?))) %
-  [ % // #Hfalse destruct | #_ % // % % ]
-| #a #al @(ex_intro ?? 2) @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? 1 (leftof ? a al)))
-  % [ % // #Hfalse destruct | #_ % // % % ]
-| #a #al @(ex_intro ?? 2) @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? 1 (rightof ? a al)))
-  % [ % // #Hfalse destruct | #_ % // % % ]
+  @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? atm1 (niltape ?))) %
+  [ % // @Hfalse | #_ % // % % ]
+| #a #al @(ex_intro ?? 2) @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? atm1 (leftof ? a al)))
+  % [ % // @Hfalse | #_ % // % % ]
+| #a #al @(ex_intro ?? 2) @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? atm1 (rightof ? a al)))
+  % [ % // @Hfalse | #_ % // % % ]
 | #ls #c #rs @(ex_intro ?? 2)
   cases (true_or_false (test c)) #Htest
-  [ @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? 1 ?))
+  [ @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? atm1 ?))
     [| % 
       [ % 
         [ whd in ⊢ (??%?); >atmr_q0_q1 //
-        | #Hfalse destruct ]
+        | @Hfalse]
       | #_ % // %2 @(ex_intro ?? c) % // ]
     ]
-  | @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? 2 (mk_tape ? (c::ls) (option_hd ? rs) (tail ? rs))))
+  | @(ex_intro ?? (mk_config ?? atm2 (mk_tape ? (c::ls) (option_hd ? rs) (tail ? rs))))
     % 
     [ %
       [ whd in ⊢ (??%?); >atmr_q0_q2 //
@@ -192,7 +200,7 @@ definition R_adv_to_mark_r ≝ λalpha,test,t1,t2.
      t2 = midtape ? (reverse ? rs1@c::ls) b rs2))).
      
 definition adv_to_mark_r ≝ 
-  λalpha,test.whileTM alpha (atmr_step alpha test) 2.
+  λalpha,test.whileTM alpha (atmr_step alpha test) atm2.
 
 lemma wsem_adv_to_mark_r :
   ∀alpha,test.
@@ -257,25 +265,6 @@ lemma sem_adv_to_mark_r :
 /2/
 qed.
 
-(* NO OPERATION
-
-  t1 = t2
-  *)
-  
-definition nop_states ≝ initN 1.
-
-definition nop ≝ 
-  λalpha:FinSet.mk_TM alpha nop_states
-  (λp.let 〈q,a〉 ≝ p in 〈q,None ?〉)
-  O (λ_.true).
-  
-definition R_nop ≝ λalpha.λt1,t2:tape alpha.t2 = t1.
-
-lemma sem_nop :
-  ∀alpha.Realize alpha (nop alpha) (R_nop alpha).
-#alpha #intape @(ex_intro ?? 1) @ex_intro [| % normalize % ]
-qed.
-
 (*
    q0 _ → q1, R
    q1 〈a,false〉 → qF, 〈a,true〉, N
@@ -285,18 +274,22 @@ qed.
  
 definition mark_states ≝ initN 3.
 
+definition mark0 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 0 (leb_true_to_le 1 3 (refl …)).
+definition mark1 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 1 (leb_true_to_le 2 3 (refl …)).
+definition mark2 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 2 (leb_true_to_le 3 3 (refl …)).
+
 definition mark ≝ 
   λalpha:FinSet.mk_TM (FinProd … alpha FinBool) mark_states
   (λp.let 〈q,a〉 ≝ p in
     match a with
-    [ None ⇒ 〈2,None ?〉
-    | Some a' ⇒ match q with
-      [ O ⇒ 〈1,Some ? 〈a',R〉〉
+    [ None ⇒ 〈mark2,None ?〉
+    | Some a' ⇒ match pi1 … q with
+      [ O ⇒ 〈mark1,Some ? 〈a',R〉〉
       | S q ⇒ match q with
         [ O ⇒ let 〈a'',b〉 ≝ a' in
-              〈2,Some ? 〈〈a'',true〉,N〉〉
-        | S _ ⇒ 〈2,None ?〉 ] ] ])
-  O (λq.q == 2).
+              〈mark2,Some ? 〈〈a'',true〉,N〉〉
+        | S _ ⇒ 〈mark2,None ?〉 ] ] ])
+  mark0 (λq.q == mark2).
   
 definition R_mark ≝ λalpha,t1,t2.
   ∀ls,c,d,b,rs.
@@ -338,6 +331,10 @@ include "turing/if_machine.ma".
 
 definition tc_states ≝ initN 3.
 
+definition tc0 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 0 (leb_true_to_le 1 3 (refl …)).
+definition tc1 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 1 (leb_true_to_le 2 3 (refl …)).
+definition atm2 : initN 3 ≝ mk_Sig ?? 2 (leb_true_to_le 3 3 (refl …)).
+
 definition test_char ≝ 
   λalpha:FinSet.λtest:alpha→bool.
   mk_TM alpha tc_states
diff --git a/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/trans_step.ma b/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/trans_step.ma
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..943045163
--- /dev/null
+++ b/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/trans_step.ma
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+(*
+    ||M||  This file is part of HELM, an Hypertextual, Electronic   
+    ||A||  Library of Mathematics, developed at the Computer Science 
+    ||T||  Department of the University of Bologna, Italy.           
+    ||I||                                                            
+    ||T||  
+    ||A||  
+    \   /  This file is distributed under the terms of the       
+     \ /   GNU General Public License Version 2   
+      V_____________________________________________________________*)
+
+
+include "turing/universal/trans_to_tuples.ma".
+
+check TM
+
+(* definition zero : ∀n.initN n ≝ λn.mk_Sig ?? 0 (le_O_n n). *)
+
+definition normalTM ≝ λn,t,h. 
+  λk:0<n.mk_TM FinBool (initN n) t (mk_Sig ?? 0 k) h.
+
+definition low_config: ∀n,h,t.config FinBool (initN n) → tape STape ≝ 
+λn,h.λtrans:trans_source n →trans_target n.λc.
+  let q ≝ cstate … c in
+  let q_low ≝  m_bits_of_state n h q in 
+  let current_low ≝
+    match current … (ctape … c) with
+    [ None ⇒ 〈null,false〉
+    | Some b ⇒ 〈bit b,false〉] in
+  let low_left ≝ map … (λb.〈bit b,false〉) (left … (ctape …c)) in
+  let low_right ≝ map … (λb.〈bit b,false〉) (right … (ctape …c)) in
+  let table ≝ flatten ? (tuples_of_pairs n h (graph_enum ?? trans)) in
+  mk_tape STape low_left (Some ? 〈grid,false〉) 
+    (q_low@current_low::〈grid,false〉::table@〈grid,false〉::low_right).
+  
+(*
+definition R_uni_step_true ≝ λt1,t2.
+  ∀n,t0,table,s0,s1,c0,c1,ls,rs,curconfig,newconfig,mv.
+  table_TM (S n) (〈t0,false〉::table) → 
+  match_in_table (S n) (〈s0,false〉::curconfig) 〈c0,false〉
+    (〈s1,false〉::newconfig) 〈c1,false〉 〈mv,false〉 (〈t0,false〉::table) → 
+  legal_tape ls 〈c0,false〉 rs → 
+  t1 = midtape STape (〈grid,false〉::ls) 〈s0,false〉 
+    (curconfig@〈c0,false〉::〈grid,false〉::〈t0,false〉::table@〈grid,false〉::rs) → 
+  ∀t1'.t1' = lift_tape ls 〈c0,false〉 rs → 
+  s0 = bit false ∧
+  ∃ls1,rs1,c2.
+  (t2 = midtape STape (〈grid,false〉::ls1) 〈s1,false〉 
+    (newconfig@〈c2,false〉::〈grid,false〉::〈t0,false〉::table@〈grid,false〉::rs1) ∧
+   lift_tape ls1 〈c2,false〉 rs1 = 
+   tape_move STape t1' (map_move c1 mv) ∧ legal_tape ls1 〈c2,false〉 rs1).
+ *)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/uni_step.ma b/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/uni_step.ma
index ea8e991e2..a2734d333 100644
--- a/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/uni_step.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/lib/turing/universal/uni_step.ma
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ definition uni_step ≝
           tc_true))))
     (nop ?)
     tc_true.
-    
+
 definition R_uni_step_true ≝ λt1,t2.
   ∀n,t0,table,s0,s1,c0,c1,ls,rs,curconfig,newconfig,mv.
   table_TM (S n) (〈t0,false〉::table) → 
@@ -486,16 +486,17 @@ definition R_uni_step_false ≝ λt1,t2.
 axiom sem_match_tuple : Realize ? match_tuple R_match_tuple.
 
 lemma sem_uni_step :
-  accRealize ? uni_step (inr … (inl … (inr … 0)))
+  accRealize ? uni_step (inr … (inl … (inr … start_nop)))
      R_uni_step_true R_uni_step_false. 
-@(acc_sem_if_app … (sem_test_char ? (λc:STape.\fst c == bit false))
-   (sem_seq … sem_init_match
-     (sem_seq … sem_match_tuple
-       (sem_if … (sem_test_char ? (λc.¬is_marked ? c))
+@(acc_sem_if_app STape … (sem_test_char ? (λc:STape.\fst c == bit false))
+   (sem_seq … sem_init_match      
+     (sem_seq … sem_match_tuple        
+       (sem_if … (* ????????? (sem_test_char …  (λc.¬is_marked FSUnialpha c)) *)
           (sem_seq … sem_exec_move (sem_move_r …))
           (sem_nop …))))
    (sem_nop …)
    …)
+[@sem_test_char||]
 [ #intape #outtape 
   #ta whd in ⊢ (%→?); #Hta #HR
   #n #t0 #table #s0 #s1 #c0 #c1 #ls #rs #curconfig #newconfig #mv
-- 
2.39.2