-type binder_type =
- Declaration of Cic.name * Cic.term
- | Definition of Cic.name * Cic.term
-;;
-
-type metasenv = (int * Cic.term) list;;
+(* Copyright (C) 2000, HELM Team.
+ *
+ * This file is part of HELM, an Hypertextual, Electronic
+ * Library of Mathematics, developed at the Computer Science
+ * Department, University of Bologna, Italy.
+ *
+ * HELM is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
+ * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * HELM is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with HELM; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston,
+ * MA 02111-1307, USA.
+ *
+ * For details, see the HELM World-Wide-Web page,
+ * http://cs.unibo.it/helm/.
+ *)
-type named_context = binder_type list;;
+open ProofEngineHelpers
+open ProofEngineTypes
-type sequent = named_context * Cic.term;;
+ (* proof assistant status *)
-let proof =
- ref (None : (UriManager.uri * metasenv * Cic.term * Cic.term) option)
-;;
-(*CSC: Quando facciamo Clear di una ipotesi, cosa succede? *)
-(* Note: the sequent is redundant: it can be computed from the type of the *)
-(* metavariable and its context in the proof. We keep it just for efficiency *)
-(* because computing the context of a term may be quite expensive. *)
-let goal = ref (None : (int * sequent) option);;
-
-exception NotImplemented
-
-let cic_context_of_named_context =
- List.map
- (function
- Declaration (_,t) -> Cic.Decl t
- | Definition (_,t) -> Cic.Def t
- )
-;;
+let proof = ref (None : proof option)
+let goal = ref (None : goal option)
-let refine_meta_with_brand_new_metasenv meta term newmetasenv =
- let (uri,bo,ty) =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (uri,_,bo,ty) -> uri,bo,ty
- in
- let subst_in t =
- ProofEngineReduction.replace ~what:(Cic.Meta meta) ~with_what:term ~where:t
- in
- let bo' = subst_in bo in
- let metasenv' = List.remove_assoc meta newmetasenv in
- proof := Some (uri,metasenv',bo',ty)
-;;
+let get_proof () = !proof;;
+let set_proof p = proof := p;;
-let refine_meta meta term newmetasenv =
- let (uri,metasenv,bo,ty) =
- match !proof with
+let get_current_status_as_xml () =
+ match get_proof () with
None -> assert false
- | Some (uri,metasenv,bo,ty) -> uri,metasenv,bo,ty
- in
- let subst_in t =
- ProofEngineReduction.replace ~what:(Cic.Meta meta) ~with_what:term ~where:t
- in
- let metasenv' = newmetasenv @ (List.remove_assoc meta metasenv) in
- let metasenv'' = List.map (function i,ty -> i,(subst_in ty)) metasenv' in
- let bo' = subst_in bo in
- proof := Some (uri,metasenv'',bo',ty)
+ | Some (uri, metasenv, bo, ty) ->
+ let uri = match uri with Some uri -> uri | None -> assert false in
+ let currentproof =
+ (*CSC: Wrong: [] is just plainly wrong *)
+ Cic.CurrentProof (UriManager.name_of_uri uri,metasenv,bo,ty,[],[])
+ in
+ let (acurrentproof,_,_,ids_to_inner_sorts,_,_,_) =
+ Cic2acic.acic_object_of_cic_object ~eta_fix:false currentproof
+ in
+ let xml, bodyxml =
+ match
+ Cic2Xml.print_object uri ~ids_to_inner_sorts
+ ~ask_dtd_to_the_getter:true acurrentproof
+ with
+ xml,Some bodyxml -> xml,bodyxml
+ | _,None -> assert false
+ in
+ (xml, bodyxml)
;;
-(* Returns the first meta whose number is above the *)
-(* number of the higher meta. *)
-let new_meta () =
- let metasenv =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (_,metasenv,_,_) -> metasenv
- in
- let rec aux =
- function
- None,[] -> 1
- | Some n,[] -> n
- | None,(n,_)::tl -> aux (Some n,tl)
- | Some m,(n,_)::tl -> if n > m then aux (Some n,tl) else aux (Some m,tl)
- in
- 1 + aux (None,metasenv)
+let apply_tactic ~tactic =
+ let module PET = ProofEngineTypes in
+ match get_proof (),!goal with
+ | None,_
+ | _,None -> assert false
+ | Some proof', Some goal' ->
+ let (newproof, newgoals) = PET.apply_tactic tactic (proof', goal') in
+ set_proof (Some newproof);
+ goal :=
+ (match newgoals, newproof with
+ goal::_, _ -> Some goal
+ | [], (_,(goal,_,_)::_,_,_) ->
+ (* the tactic left no open goal ; let's choose the first open goal *)
+ (*CSC: here we could implement and use a proof-tree like notion... *)
+ Some goal
+ | _, _ -> None)
;;
(* metas_in_term term *)
let module C = Cic in
let rec aux =
function
- C.Rel _
- | C.Var _ -> []
- | C.Meta n -> [n]
+ C.Rel _ -> []
+ | C.Meta (n,_) -> [n]
| C.Sort _
- | C.Implicit -> []
+ | C.Implicit _ -> []
| C.Cast (te,ty) -> (aux te) @ (aux ty)
| C.Prod (_,s,t) -> (aux s) @ (aux t)
| C.Lambda (_,s,t) -> (aux s) @ (aux t)
| C.LetIn (_,s,t) -> (aux s) @ (aux t)
| C.Appl l -> List.fold_left (fun i t -> i @ (aux t)) [] l
- | C.Const _
- | C.Abst _
- | C.MutInd _
- | C.MutConstruct _ -> []
- | C.MutCase (sp,cookingsno,i,outt,t,pl) ->
+ | C.Var (_,exp_named_subst)
+ | C.Const (_,exp_named_subst)
+ | C.MutInd (_,_,exp_named_subst)
+ | C.MutConstruct (_,_,_,exp_named_subst) ->
+ List.fold_left (fun i (_,t) -> i @ (aux t)) [] exp_named_subst
+ | C.MutCase (_,_,outt,t,pl) ->
(aux outt) @ (aux t) @
(List.fold_left (fun i t -> i @ (aux t)) [] pl)
- | C.Fix (i,fl) ->
+ | C.Fix (_,fl) ->
List.fold_left (fun i (_,_,ty,bo) -> i @ (aux bo) @ (aux ty)) [] fl
- | C.CoFix (i,fl) ->
+ | C.CoFix (_,fl) ->
List.fold_left (fun i (_,ty,bo) -> i @ (aux bo) @ (aux ty)) [] fl
in
let metas = aux term in
he::(elim_duplicates (List.filter (function el -> he <> el) tl))
in
elim_duplicates metas
-;;
(* perforate context term ty *)
(* replaces the term [term] in the proof with a new metavariable whose type *)
(* are efficiency reasons. *)
let perforate context term ty =
let module C = Cic in
- let newmeta = new_meta () in
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (uri,metasenv,bo,gty) ->
+ match get_proof () with
+ None -> assert false
+ | Some (uri,metasenv,bo,gty as proof') ->
+ let newmeta = new_meta_of_proof proof' in
(* We push the new meta at the end of the list for pretty-printing *)
(* purposes: in this way metas are ordered. *)
- let metasenv' = metasenv@[newmeta,ty] in
- let bo' = ProofEngineReduction.replace term (C.Meta newmeta) bo in
+ let metasenv' = metasenv@[newmeta,context,ty] in
+ let irl =
+ CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context
+ in
+(*CSC: Bug: se ci sono due term uguali nella prova dovrei bucarne uno solo!!!*)
+ let bo' =
+ ProofEngineReduction.replace (==) [term] [C.Meta (newmeta,irl)] bo
+ in
(* It may be possible that some metavariables occurred only in *)
(* the term we are perforating and they now occurs no more. We *)
(* get rid of them, collecting the really useful metavariables *)
(* in metasenv''. *)
+(*CSC: Bug: una meta potrebbe non comparire in bo', ma comparire nel tipo *)
+(*CSC: di una metavariabile che compare in bo'!!!!!!! *)
let newmetas = metas_in_term bo' in
let metasenv'' =
- List.filter (function (n,_) -> List.mem n newmetas) metasenv'
+ List.filter (function (n,_,_) -> List.mem n newmetas) metasenv'
in
- proof := Some (uri,metasenv'',bo',gty) ;
- goal := Some (newmeta,(context,ty)) ;
- newmeta
-;;
+ set_proof (Some (uri,metasenv'',bo',gty)) ;
+ goal := Some newmeta
+
(************************************************************)
(* Some easy tactics. *)
(************************************************************)
-exception Fail of string;;
-
-let intros () =
- let module C = Cic in
- let module R = CicReduction in
- let metasenv =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (_,metasenv,_,_) -> metasenv
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) -> metano,context,ty
- in
- let newmeta = new_meta () in
- let rec collect_context =
- function
- C.Cast (te,_) -> collect_context te
- | C.Prod (n,s,t) ->
- let (ctx,ty,bo) = collect_context t in
- let n' =
- match n with
- C.Name _ -> n
-(*CSC: generatore di nomi? Chiedere il nome? *)
- | C.Anonimous -> C.Name "fresh_name"
- in
- ((Declaration (n',s))::ctx,ty,C.Lambda(n',s,bo))
- | C.LetIn (n,s,t) ->
- let (ctx,ty,bo) = collect_context t in
- ((Definition (n,s))::ctx,ty,C.LetIn(n,s,bo))
- | _ as t -> [], t, (C.Meta newmeta)
- in
- let revcontext',ty',bo' = collect_context ty in
- let context'' = (List.rev revcontext') @ context in
- refine_meta metano bo' [newmeta,ty'] ;
- goal := Some (newmeta,(context'',ty'))
+(* Reduces [term] using [reduction_function] in the current scratch goal [ty] *)
+let reduction_tactic_in_scratch reduction_function terms ty =
+ let metasenv =
+ match get_proof () with
+ None -> []
+ | Some (_,metasenv,_,_) -> metasenv
+ in
+ let metano,context,_ =
+ match !goal with
+ None -> assert false
+ | Some metano -> List.find (function (m,_,_) -> m=metano) metasenv
+ in
+ let terms' = List.map (reduction_function context) terms in
+ ProofEngineReduction.replace
+ ~equality:(==) ~what:terms ~with_what:terms' ~where:ty
;;
-(* The term bo must be closed in the current context *)
-let exact bo =
- let module T = CicTypeChecker in
- let module R = CicReduction in
- let metasenv =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (_,metasenv,_,_) -> metasenv
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) ->
- assert (ty = List.assoc metano metasenv) ;
- (* Invariant: context is the actual context of the meta in the proof *)
- metano,context,ty
- in
- let context = cic_context_of_named_context context in
- if R.are_convertible (T.type_of_aux' metasenv context bo) ty then
- begin
- refine_meta metano bo [] ;
- goal := None
- end
- else
- raise (Fail "The type of the provided term is not the one expected.")
-;;
+let whd_in_scratch = reduction_tactic_in_scratch CicReduction.whd
+let reduce_in_scratch = reduction_tactic_in_scratch ProofEngineReduction.reduce
+let simpl_in_scratch = reduction_tactic_in_scratch ProofEngineReduction.simpl
-(* Auxiliary function for apply: given a type (a backbone), it returns its *)
-(* head, a META environment in which there is a META for each hypothesis and *)
-(* the indexes of the first and last new METAs introduced. *)
-let new_metasenv_for_apply ty =
- let module C = Cic in
- let module S = CicSubstitution in
- let rec aux newmeta =
- function
- C.Cast (he,_) -> aux newmeta he
- | C.Prod (_,s,t) ->
- let (res,newmetasenv,lastmeta) =
- aux (newmeta + 1) (S.subst (C.Meta newmeta) t)
- in
- res,(newmeta,s)::newmetasenv,lastmeta
- | t -> t,[],newmeta
- in
- let newmeta = new_meta () in
- (* WARNING: here we are using the invariant that above the most *)
- (* recente new_meta() there are no used metas. *)
- let (res,newmetasenv,lastmeta) = aux newmeta ty in
- res,newmetasenv,newmeta,lastmeta
-;;
+(************************************************************)
+(* Tactics defined elsewhere *)
+(************************************************************)
-(*CSC: ma serve solamente la prima delle new_uninst e l'unione delle due!!! *)
-let classify_metas newmeta in_subst_domain apply_subst =
- List.fold_left
- (fun (old_uninst,new_uninst) (i,ty) ->
- if in_subst_domain i then
- old_uninst,new_uninst
- else
- let ty' = apply_subst ty in
- if i < newmeta then
- ((i,ty')::old_uninst),new_uninst
- else
- old_uninst,((i,ty')::new_uninst)
- ) ([],[])
-;;
+ (* primitive tactics *)
-(* The term bo must be closed in the current context *)
-let apply term =
- let module T = CicTypeChecker in
- let module R = CicReduction in
- let module C = Cic in
- let metasenv =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (_,metasenv,_,_) -> metasenv
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) ->
- assert (ty = List.assoc metano metasenv) ;
- (* Invariant: context is the actual context of the meta in the proof *)
- metano,context,ty
- in
- let ciccontext = cic_context_of_named_context context in
- let termty = CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv ciccontext term in
- (* newmeta is the lowest index of the new metas introduced *)
- let (consthead,newmetas,newmeta,_) = new_metasenv_for_apply termty in
- let newmetasenv = newmetas@metasenv in
- let subst = CicUnification.fo_unif newmetasenv ciccontext consthead ty in
- let in_subst_domain i = List.exists (function (j,_) -> i=j) subst in
- let apply_subst = CicUnification.apply_subst subst in
- let old_uninstantiatedmetas,new_uninstantiatedmetas =
- classify_metas newmeta in_subst_domain apply_subst newmetasenv
- in
- let bo' =
- if List.length newmetas = 0 then
- term
- else
- let arguments =
- List.map apply_subst
- (List.map (function (i,_) -> C.Meta i) newmetas)
- in
- Cic.Appl (term::arguments)
- in
- refine_meta_with_brand_new_metasenv metano bo'
- (new_uninstantiatedmetas@old_uninstantiatedmetas) ;
- match new_uninstantiatedmetas with
- [] -> goal := None
- | (i,ty)::_ -> goal := Some (i,(context,ty))
-;;
+let apply term = apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.apply_tac ~term)
+let intros ?mk_fresh_name_callback () =
+ apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.intros_tac ?mk_fresh_name_callback ())
+let cut ?mk_fresh_name_callback term =
+ apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.cut_tac ?mk_fresh_name_callback ~term)
+let letin ?mk_fresh_name_callback term =
+ apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.letin_tac ?mk_fresh_name_callback ~term)
+let exact term = apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.exact_tac ~term)
+let elim_intros_simpl term =
+ apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.elim_intros_simpl_tac ~term)
+let change ~goal_input:what ~input:with_what =
+ apply_tactic (PrimitiveTactics.change_tac ~what ~with_what)
-let eta_expand metasenv ciccontext t arg =
- let module T = CicTypeChecker in
- let module S = CicSubstitution in
- let module C = Cic in
- let rec aux n =
- function
- t' when t' = S.lift n arg -> C.Rel (1 + n)
- | C.Rel m -> if m <= n then C.Rel m else C.Rel (m+1)
- | C.Var _
- | C.Meta _
- | C.Sort _
- | C.Implicit as t -> t
- | C.Cast (te,ty) -> C.Cast (aux n te, aux n ty)
- | C.Prod (nn,s,t) -> C.Prod (nn, aux n s, aux (n+1) t)
- | C.Lambda (nn,s,t) -> C.Lambda (nn, aux n s, aux (n+1) t)
- | C.LetIn (nn,s,t) -> C.LetIn (nn, aux n s, aux (n+1) t)
- | C.Appl l -> C.Appl (List.map (aux n) l)
- | C.Const _ as t -> t
- | C.Abst _ -> assert false
- | C.MutInd _
- | C.MutConstruct _ as t -> t
- | C.MutCase (sp,cookingsno,i,outt,t,pl) ->
- C.MutCase (sp,cookingsno,i,aux n outt, aux n t,
- List.map (aux n) pl)
- | C.Fix (i,fl) ->
- let tylen = List.length fl in
- let substitutedfl =
- List.map
- (fun (name,i,ty,bo) -> (name, i, aux n ty, aux (n+tylen) bo))
- fl
- in
- C.Fix (i, substitutedfl)
- | C.CoFix (i,fl) ->
- let tylen = List.length fl in
- let substitutedfl =
- List.map
- (fun (name,ty,bo) -> (name, aux n ty, aux (n+tylen) bo))
- fl
- in
- C.CoFix (i, substitutedfl)
- in
- let argty =
- T.type_of_aux' metasenv ciccontext arg
- in
- (C.Appl [C.Lambda ((C.Name "dummy"),argty,aux 0 t) ; arg])
-;;
+ (* structural tactics *)
-exception NotAnInductiveTypeToEliminate;;
-exception NotTheRightEliminatorShape;;
-exception NoHypothesesFound;;
+let clearbody hyp = apply_tactic (ProofEngineStructuralRules.clearbody ~hyp)
+let clear hyp = apply_tactic (ProofEngineStructuralRules.clear ~hyp)
-let elim term =
- let module T = CicTypeChecker in
- let module U = UriManager in
- let module R = CicReduction in
- let module C = Cic in
- let curi,metasenv =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (curi,metasenv,_,_) -> curi,metasenv
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) ->
- assert (ty = List.assoc metano metasenv) ;
- (* Invariant: context is the actual context of the meta in the proof *)
- metano,context,ty
- in
- let ciccontext = cic_context_of_named_context context in
- let termty = T.type_of_aux' metasenv ciccontext term in
- let uri,cookingno,typeno,args =
- match termty with
- C.MutInd (uri,cookingno,typeno) -> (uri,cookingno,typeno,[])
- | C.Appl ((C.MutInd (uri,cookingno,typeno))::args) ->
- (uri,cookingno,typeno,args)
- | _ -> raise NotAnInductiveTypeToEliminate
- in
- let eliminator_uri =
- let buri = U.buri_of_uri uri in
- let name =
- match CicEnvironment.get_cooked_obj uri cookingno with
- C.InductiveDefinition (tys,_,_) ->
- let (name,_,_,_) = List.nth tys typeno in
- name
- | _ -> assert false
- in
- let ext =
- match T.type_of_aux' metasenv ciccontext ty with
- C.Sort C.Prop -> "_ind"
- | C.Sort C.Set -> "_rec"
- | C.Sort C.Type -> "_rect"
- | _ -> assert false
- in
- U.uri_of_string (buri ^ "/" ^ name ^ ext ^ ".con")
- in
- let eliminator_cookingno =
- UriManager.relative_depth curi eliminator_uri 0
- in
- let eliminator_ref = C.Const (eliminator_uri,eliminator_cookingno) in
- let ety =
- T.type_of_aux' [] [] eliminator_ref
- in
- let (econclusion,newmetas,newmeta,lastmeta) =
- new_metasenv_for_apply ety
- in
- (* Here we assume that we have only one inductive hypothesis to *)
- (* eliminate and that it is the last hypothesis of the theorem. *)
- (* A better approach would be fingering the hypotheses in some *)
- (* way. *)
- let meta_of_corpse = Cic.Meta (lastmeta - 1) in
- let newmetasenv = newmetas @ metasenv in
-prerr_endline ("ECONCLUSION: " ^ CicPp.ppterm econclusion) ;
-flush stderr ;
- let subst1 =
- CicUnification.fo_unif newmetasenv ciccontext term meta_of_corpse
- in
- let ueconclusion = CicUnification.apply_subst subst1 econclusion in
-prerr_endline ("ECONCLUSION DOPO UNWIND: " ^ CicPp.ppterm ueconclusion) ;
-flush stderr ;
- (* The conclusion of our elimination principle is *)
- (* (?i farg1 ... fargn) *)
- (* The conclusion of our goal is ty. So, we can *)
- (* eta-expand ty w.r.t. farg1 .... fargn to get *)
- (* a new ty equal to (P farg1 ... fargn). Now *)
- (* ?i can be instantiated with P and we are ready *)
- (* to refine the term. *)
- let emeta, fargs =
- match ueconclusion with
- C.Appl ((C.Meta emeta)::fargs) -> emeta,fargs
- | _ -> raise NotTheRightEliminatorShape
- in
- let ty' = CicUnification.apply_subst subst1 ty in
- let eta_expanded_ty =
- List.fold_left (eta_expand metasenv ciccontext) ty' fargs
- in
-prerr_endline ("ETAEXPANDEDTY:" ^ CicPp.ppterm eta_expanded_ty) ; flush stdout ;
- let subst2 =
-(*CSC: passo newmetasenv, ma alcune variabili sono gia' state sostituite
-da subst1!!!! Dovrei rimuoverle o sono innocue?*)
- CicUnification.fo_unif
- newmetasenv ciccontext ueconclusion eta_expanded_ty
- in
-prerr_endline "Dopo la seconda unificazione" ; flush stdout ;
-prerr_endline "unwind"; flush stderr;
- let in_subst_domain i =
- let eq_to_i = function (j,_) -> i=j in
- List.exists eq_to_i subst1 ||
- List.exists eq_to_i subst2
- in
- (* When unwinding the META that corresponds to the elimination *)
- (* predicate (which is emeta), we must also perform one-step *)
- (* beta-reduction. *)
- let apply_subst =
- function t ->
- let t' = CicUnification.apply_subst subst1 t in
- CicUnification.apply_subst_reducing
- subst2 (Some (emeta,List.length fargs)) t'
- in
- let newmetasenv' =
- List.map (function (i,ty) -> i, apply_subst ty) newmetasenv
- in
- let old_uninstantiatedmetas,new_uninstantiatedmetas =
- classify_metas newmeta in_subst_domain apply_subst newmetasenv
- in
- let arguments =
- List.map apply_subst
- (List.map (function (i,_) -> C.Meta i) newmetas)
- in
- let bo' = Cic.Appl (eliminator_ref::arguments) in
-prerr_endline ("BODY': " ^ CicPp.ppterm bo') ; flush stdout ;
-List.iter (function (i,t) -> prerr_endline ("?" ^ string_of_int i ^ ": " ^ CicPp.ppterm t)) (new_uninstantiatedmetas@old_uninstantiatedmetas) ; flush stderr ;
- refine_meta_with_brand_new_metasenv metano bo'
- (new_uninstantiatedmetas@old_uninstantiatedmetas) ;
- match new_uninstantiatedmetas with
- [] -> goal := None
- | (i,ty)::_ -> goal := Some (i,(context,ty))
-;;
+ (* reduction tactics *)
-let elim_intros term =
- elim term ;
- intros ()
-;;
+let whd terms =
+ apply_tactic
+ (ReductionTactics.whd_tac ~also_in_hypotheses:true ~terms:(Some terms))
+let reduce terms =
+ apply_tactic
+ (ReductionTactics.reduce_tac ~also_in_hypotheses:true ~terms:(Some terms))
+let simpl terms =
+ apply_tactic
+ (ReductionTactics.simpl_tac ~also_in_hypotheses:true ~terms:(Some terms))
-let reduction_tactic reduction_function term =
- let curi,metasenv,pbo,pty =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (curi,metasenv,bo,ty) -> curi,metasenv,bo,ty
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) -> metano,context,ty
- in
- let term' = reduction_function term in
- (* We don't know if [term] is a subterm of [ty] or a subterm of *)
- (* the type of one metavariable. So we replace it everywhere. *)
- (*CSC: ma si potrebbe ovviare al problema. Ma non credo *)
- (*CSC: che si guadagni nulla in fatto di efficienza. *)
- let replace = ProofEngineReduction.replace ~what:term ~with_what:term' in
- let ty' = replace ty in
- let context' =
- List.map
- (function
- Definition (n,t) -> Definition (n,replace t)
- | Declaration (n,t) -> Declaration (n,replace t)
- ) context
- in
- let metasenv' =
- List.map
- (function
- (n,_) when n = metano -> (metano,ty')
- | _ as t -> t
- ) metasenv
- in
- proof := Some (curi,metasenv',pbo,pty) ;
- goal := Some (metano,(context',ty'))
-;;
+let fold_whd term =
+ apply_tactic
+ (ReductionTactics.fold_tac ~reduction:CicReduction.whd
+ ~also_in_hypotheses:true ~term)
+let fold_reduce term =
+ apply_tactic
+ (ReductionTactics.fold_tac ~reduction:ProofEngineReduction.reduce
+ ~also_in_hypotheses:true ~term)
+let fold_simpl term =
+ apply_tactic
+ (ReductionTactics.fold_tac ~reduction:ProofEngineReduction.simpl
+ ~also_in_hypotheses:true ~term)
-let reduction_tactic_in_scratch reduction_function ty term =
- let metasenv =
- match !proof with
- None -> []
- | Some (_,metasenv,_,_) -> metasenv
- in
- let context =
- match !goal with
- None -> []
- | Some (_,(context,_)) -> context
- in
- let term' = reduction_function term in
- ProofEngineReduction.replace ~what:term ~with_what:term' ~where:ty
-;;
+ (* other tactics *)
-let whd = reduction_tactic CicReduction.whd;;
-let reduce = reduction_tactic ProofEngineReduction.reduce;;
-let simpl = reduction_tactic ProofEngineReduction.simpl;;
+let elim_type term = apply_tactic (EliminationTactics.elim_type_tac ~term)
+let ring () = apply_tactic Ring.ring_tac
+let fourier () = apply_tactic FourierR.fourier_tac
-let whd_in_scratch = reduction_tactic_in_scratch CicReduction.whd;;
-let reduce_in_scratch =
- reduction_tactic_in_scratch ProofEngineReduction.reduce;;
-let simpl_in_scratch =
- reduction_tactic_in_scratch ProofEngineReduction.simpl;;
+(* let auto ~dbd () = apply_tactic (AutoTactic.auto_tac ~dbd) *)
+let auto ~dbd () = apply_tactic (AutoTactic.auto_tac_new ~dbd)
-(* It is just the opposite of whd. The code should probably be merged. *)
-let fold term =
- let curi,metasenv,pbo,pty =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (curi,metasenv,bo,ty) -> curi,metasenv,bo,ty
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) -> metano,context,ty
- in
- let term' = CicReduction.whd term in
- (* We don't know if [term] is a subterm of [ty] or a subterm of *)
- (* the type of one metavariable. So we replace it everywhere. *)
- (*CSC: ma si potrebbe ovviare al problema. Ma non credo *)
- (*CSC: che si guadagni nulla in fatto di efficienza. *)
- let replace = ProofEngineReduction.replace ~what:term' ~with_what:term in
- let ty' = replace ty in
- let context' =
- List.map
- (function
- Declaration (n,t) -> Declaration (n,replace t)
- | Definition (n,t) -> Definition (n,replace t)
- ) context
- in
- let metasenv' =
- List.map
- (function
- (n,_) when n = metano -> (metano,ty')
- | _ as t -> t
- ) metasenv
- in
- proof := Some (curi,metasenv',pbo,pty) ;
- goal := Some (metano,(context',ty'))
-;;
-let cut term =
- let module C = Cic in
- let curi,metasenv,pbo,pty =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (curi,metasenv,bo,ty) -> curi,metasenv,bo,ty
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) -> metano,context,ty
- in
- let newmeta1 = new_meta () in
- let newmeta2 = newmeta1 + 1 in
- let newmeta1ty = CicSubstitution.lift 1 ty in
- let bo' =
- C.Appl
- [C.Lambda (C.Name "dummy_for_cut",term,C.Meta newmeta1) ;
- C.Meta newmeta2]
- in
-prerr_endline ("BO': " ^ CicPp.ppterm bo') ; flush stderr ;
- refine_meta metano bo' [newmeta2,term; newmeta1,newmeta1ty];
- goal :=
- Some
- (newmeta1,((Declaration (C.Name "dummy_for_cut", term))::context,
- newmeta1ty))
-;;
+let rewrite_simpl term = apply_tactic (EqualityTactics.rewrite_simpl_tac ~term)
+let rewrite_back_simpl term = apply_tactic (EqualityTactics.rewrite_back_simpl_tac ~term)
+let replace ~goal_input:what ~input:with_what =
+ apply_tactic (EqualityTactics.replace_tac ~what ~with_what)
-let letin term =
- let module C = Cic in
- let curi,metasenv,pbo,pty =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (curi,metasenv,bo,ty) -> curi,metasenv,bo,ty
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) -> metano,context,ty
- in
- let ciccontext = cic_context_of_named_context context in
- let _ = CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv ciccontext term in
- let newmeta = new_meta () in
- let newmetaty = CicSubstitution.lift 1 ty in
- let bo' = C.LetIn (C.Name "dummy_for_letin",term,C.Meta newmeta) in
- refine_meta metano bo' [newmeta,newmetaty];
- goal :=
- Some
- (newmeta,
- ((Definition (C.Name "dummy_for_letin", term))::context, newmetaty))
-;;
+let reflexivity () = apply_tactic EqualityTactics.reflexivity_tac
+let symmetry () = apply_tactic EqualityTactics.symmetry_tac
+let transitivity term = apply_tactic (EqualityTactics.transitivity_tac ~term)
-exception NotConvertible;;
+let exists () = apply_tactic IntroductionTactics.exists_tac
+let split () = apply_tactic IntroductionTactics.split_tac
+let left () = apply_tactic IntroductionTactics.left_tac
+let right () = apply_tactic IntroductionTactics.right_tac
+
+let assumption () = apply_tactic VariousTactics.assumption_tac
+
+let generalize ?mk_fresh_name_callback terms =
+ apply_tactic (VariousTactics.generalize_tac ?mk_fresh_name_callback terms)
+
+let absurd term = apply_tactic (NegationTactics.absurd_tac ~term)
+let contradiction () = apply_tactic NegationTactics.contradiction_tac
+
+let decompose ~uris_choice_callback term =
+ apply_tactic (EliminationTactics.decompose_tac ~uris_choice_callback term)
+
+let injection term = apply_tactic (DiscriminationTactics.injection_tac ~term)
+let discriminate term = apply_tactic (DiscriminationTactics.discriminate_tac ~term)
+let decide_equality () = apply_tactic DiscriminationTactics.decide_equality_tac
+let compare term = apply_tactic (DiscriminationTactics.compare_tac ~term)
+
+(*
+let prova_tatticali () = apply_tactic Tacticals.prova_tac
+*)
-(*CSC: Bug (or feature?). [input] is parsed in the context of the goal, *)
-(*CSC: while [goal_input] can have a richer context (because of binders) *)
-(*CSC: So it is _NOT_ possible to use those binders in the [input] term. *)
-(*CSC: Is that evident? Is that right? Or should it be changed? *)
-let change ~goal_input ~input =
- let curi,metasenv,pbo,pty =
- match !proof with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (curi,metasenv,bo,ty) -> curi,metasenv,bo,ty
- in
- let (metano,context,ty) =
- match !goal with
- None -> assert false
- | Some (metano,(context,ty)) -> metano,context,ty
- in
- let ciccontext = cic_context_of_named_context context in
- (* are_convertible works only on well-typed terms *)
- ignore (CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv ciccontext input) ;
- if CicReduction.are_convertible goal_input input then
- begin
- let ty' = ProofEngineReduction.replace goal_input input ty in
- let metasenv' =
- List.map
- (function
- (n,_) when n = metano -> (metano,ty')
- | _ as t -> t
- ) metasenv
- in
- proof := Some (curi,metasenv',pbo,pty) ;
- goal := Some (metano,(context,ty'))
- end
- else
- raise NotConvertible
-;;
projects / helm.git / blobdiff