(* *)
(***************************************************************************)
+let p_mtr a b = Mpresentation.Mtr(a,b)
+let p_mtd a b = Mpresentation.Mtd(a,b)
+let p_mtable a b = Mpresentation.Mtable(a,b)
+let p_mtext a b = Mpresentation.Mtext(a,b)
+let p_mi a b = Mpresentation.Mi(a,b)
+let p_mo a b = Mpresentation.Mo(a,b)
+let p_mrow a b = Mpresentation.Mrow(a,b)
+let p_mphantom a b = Mpresentation.Mphantom(a,b)
+
+
let rec split n l =
if n = 0 then [],l
else let l1,l2 =
let make_args_for_apply term2pres args =
let module Con = Content in
let module P = Mpresentation in
- let rec make_arg_for_apply is_first arg row =
- (match arg with
+ let make_arg_for_apply is_first arg row =
+ let res =
+ match arg with
Con.Aux n -> assert false
| Con.Premise prem ->
let name =
(match prem.Con.premise_binder with
None -> "previous"
| Some s -> s) in
- P.smallskip::P.Mi([],name)::row
+ P.Mi([],name)::row
| Con.Lemma lemma ->
- P.smallskip::P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)::row
+ P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)::row
| Con.Term t ->
if is_first then
(term2pres t)::row
- else P.smallskip::P.Mi([],"_")::row
+ else P.Mi([],"_")::row
| Con.ArgProof _
| Con.ArgMethod _ ->
- P.smallskip::P.Mi([],"_")::row) in
- match args with
- hd::tl ->
- make_arg_for_apply true hd
- (List.fold_right (make_arg_for_apply false) tl [])
- | _ -> assert false;;
+ P.Mi([],"_")::row
+ in
+ if is_first then res else P.smallskip::res
+ in
+ match args with
+ hd::tl ->
+ make_arg_for_apply true hd
+ (List.fold_right (make_arg_for_apply false) tl [])
+ | _ -> assert false
+;;
let rec justification term2pres p =
let module Con = Content in
| Some ac ->
P.Maction
([None,"actiontype","toggle" ; None,"selection","1"],
- [(make_concl "proof of" ac); body])
+ [(make_concl ~attrs:[Some "helm", "xref", p.Con.proof_id]
+ "proof of" ac); body])
in
P.Mtable ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
None,"columnalign","left"],
P.Mrow ([],
[P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"Suppose");
P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);
- P.Mtext([],"(");
+ P.Mo([],"(");
P.Mi ([],s);
- P.Mtext([],")");
+ P.Mo([],")");
P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);
ty])
| None ->
prerr_endline "NO NAME!!"; assert false)
- | `Proof p -> proof2pres p
+ | `Proof p ->
+ proof2pres p
| `Definition d ->
(match d.Con.def_name with
Some s ->
let module P = Mpresentation in
let tconclude_body =
match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
- Some t when not omit_conclusion ->
+ Some t when
+ not omit_conclusion or
+ (* CSC: I ignore the omit_conclusion flag in this case. *)
+ (* CSC: Is this the correct behaviour? In the stylesheets *)
+ (* CSC: we simply generated nothing (i.e. the output type *)
+ (* CSC: of the function should become an option. *)
+ conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" ->
let concl = (term2pres t) in
if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "BU_Conversion" then
make_concl "that is equivalent to" concl
+ else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "FalseInd" then
+ (* false ind is in charge to add the conclusion *)
+ falseind conclude
else
let conclude_body = conclude_aux conclude in
- let ann_concl = make_concl "we conclude" concl in
+ let ann_concl =
+ if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "TD_Conversion" then
+ make_concl "that is equivalent to" concl
+ else make_concl "we conclude" concl in
P.Mtable ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
None,"columnalign","left"],
[P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],conclude_body)]);
| _ -> assert false) in
(match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
None ->
- P.Mrow []
- [P.Mtext [None, "mathcolor", "red"] "Consider" ; P.smallskip; arg]
+ p_mrow []
+ [p_mtext [None, "mathcolor", "red"] "Consider" ; P.smallskip; arg]
| Some c -> let conclusion = term2pres c in
make_row
[arg; P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);P.Mtext([],"proves")]
(make_concl "we proved 1" conclusion))])]);
| _ -> assert false)
*)
+ else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Case") then
+ case conclude
else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "ByInduction") then
byinduction conclude
+ else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Exists") then
+ exists conclude
+ else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "AndInd") then
+ andind conclude
+ else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "FalseInd") then
+ falseind conclude
else if (conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Rewrite") then
let justif =
(match (List.nth conclude.Con.conclude_args 6) with
P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"with");
P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);term2]))]);
P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],P.indented justif)])]);
-(* OLD CODE
- let conclusion =
- (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
- None -> P.Mtext([],"NO Conclusion!!!")
- | Some c -> term2pres c) in
- P.Mtable ([None,"align","baseline 1";None,"equalrows","false";
- None,"columnalign","left"],
- [P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],P.Mrow([],[
- P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"rewrite");
- P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);term1;
- P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);
- P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"with");
- P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);term2]))]);
- P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],P.indented justif)]);
- P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],make_concl "we proved 2" conclusion)])]) *)
else if conclude.Con.conclude_method = "Apply" then
let pres_args =
make_args_for_apply term2pres conclude.Con.conclude_args in
P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"by")::
P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"])::
P.Mo([],"(")::pres_args@[P.Mo([],")")])
-(* OLD CODE
- let by =
- P.Mrow([],
- P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"by")::P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"])::
- P.Mo([],"(")::pres_args@[P.Mo([],")")]) in
- match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
- None -> P.Mrow([],[P.Mtext([],"QUA");by])
- | Some t ->
- let concl = (term2pres t) in
- let ann_concl = make_concl "we proved 3" concl in
- P.Mtable ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
- None,"columnalign","left";
- Some "helm", "xref", conclude.Con.conclude_id],
- [P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],by)]);
- P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],ann_concl)])]) *)
else
P.Mtable
([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false"; None,"columnalign","left"],
([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
None,"columnalign","left"],
args2pres conclude.Con.conclude_args))))])])
-(* OLD CODE
- match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
- None -> body
- | Some t ->
- let concl = (term2pres t) in
- let ann_concl = make_concl "we proved 4" concl in
- P.Mtable ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
- None,"columnalign","left"],
- [P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],body)]);
- P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],ann_concl)])]) *)
and args2pres l =
let module P = Mpresentation in
| Con.ArgMethod s ->
P.Mtext ([],"method")
+ and case conclude =
+ let module P = Mpresentation in
+ let module Con = Content in
+ let proof_conclusion =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
+ None -> P.Mtext([],"No conclusion???")
+ | Some t -> term2pres t) in
+ let arg,args_for_cases =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with
+ Con.Aux(_)::Con.Aux(_)::Con.Term(_)::arg::tl ->
+ arg,tl
+ | _ -> assert false) in
+ let case_on =
+ let case_arg =
+ (match arg with
+ Con.Aux n ->
+ P.Mtext ([],"an aux???")
+ | Con.Premise prem ->
+ (match prem.Con.premise_binder with
+ None -> P.Mtext ([],"the previous result")
+ | Some n -> P.Mi([],n))
+ | Con.Lemma lemma -> P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)
+ | Con.Term t ->
+ term2pres t
+ | Con.ArgProof p ->
+ P.Mtext ([],"a proof???")
+ | Con.ArgMethod s ->
+ P.Mtext ([],"a method???")) in
+ (make_concl "we proceede by cases on" case_arg) in
+ let to_prove =
+ (make_concl "to prove" proof_conclusion) in
+ P.Mtable
+ ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
+ None,"columnalign","left"],
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],case_on)])::
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],to_prove)])::
+ (make_cases args_for_cases))
+
and byinduction conclude =
let module P = Mpresentation in
let module Con = Content in
P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],induction_on)])::
P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],to_prove)])::
(make_cases args_for_cases))
-(* OLD CODE
- let we_proved =
- (make_concl "we proved 5" proof_conclusion) in
- P.Mtable
- ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false"; None,"columnalign","left"],
- P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],induction_on)])::
- P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],to_prove)])::
- (make_cases args_for_cases) @
- [P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],we_proved)])]) *)
-
+
and make_cases args_for_cases =
let module P = Mpresentation in
List.map
None -> "no name"
| Some s -> s) in
P.indented (P.Mrow ([],
- [P.Mtext([],"(");
+ [P.Mo([],"(");
P.Mi ([],name);
- P.Mtext([],")");
+ P.Mo([],")");
P.Mspace([None,"width","0.1cm"]);
term2pres h.Con.dec_type]))
| _ -> assert false in
acontext2pres_old p.Con.proof_apply_context true in *)
let body = conclude2pres p.Con.proof_conclude true false in
let presacontext =
+ let acontext_id =
+ match p.Con.proof_apply_context with
+ [] -> p.Con.proof_conclude.Con.conclude_id
+ | {Con.proof_id = id}::_ -> id
+ in
P.Maction([None,"actiontype","toggle" ; None,"selection","1"],
- [P.indented (P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"Proof"));
+ [P.indented
+ (P.Mtext
+ ([None,"mathcolor","Red" ;
+ Some "helm", "xref", acontext_id],"Proof")) ;
acontext2pres p.Con.proof_apply_context body true]) in
P.Mtable ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
None,"columnalign","left"],
pattern::asubconcl::induction_hypothesis@
[P.Mtr([],[P.Mtd([],presacontext)])])
- | _ -> assert false in
+ | _ -> assert false
+
+ and falseind conclude =
+ let module P = Mpresentation in
+ let module Con = Content in
+ let proof_conclusion =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
+ None -> P.Mtext([],"No conclusion???")
+ | Some t -> term2pres t) in
+ let case_arg =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with
+ [Con.Aux(n);_;case_arg] -> case_arg
+ | _ -> assert false;
+ (*
+ List.map (ContentPp.parg 0) conclude.Con.conclude_args;
+ assert false *)) in
+ let arg =
+ (match case_arg with
+ Con.Aux n -> assert false
+ | Con.Premise prem ->
+ (match prem.Con.premise_binder with
+ None -> [P.Mtext([],"Contradiction, hence")]
+ | Some n ->
+ [P.Mi([],n);P.smallskip;P.Mtext([],"is contradictory, hence")])
+ | Con.Lemma lemma ->
+ [P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name);P.smallskip;P.Mtext([],"is contradictory, hence")]
+ | _ -> assert false) in
+ (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} in *)
+ make_row arg proof_conclusion
+
+ and andind conclude =
+ let module P = Mpresentation in
+ let module Con = Content in
+ let proof_conclusion =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
+ None -> P.Mtext([],"No conclusion???")
+ | Some t -> term2pres t) in
+ let proof,case_arg =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with
+ [Con.Aux(n);_;Con.ArgProof proof;case_arg] -> proof,case_arg
+ | _ -> assert false;
+ (*
+ List.map (ContentPp.parg 0) conclude.Con.conclude_args;
+ assert false *)) in
+ let arg =
+ (match case_arg with
+ Con.Aux n -> assert false
+ | Con.Premise prem ->
+ (match prem.Con.premise_binder with
+ None -> []
+ | Some n -> [P.Mtext([],"by");P.smallskip;P.Mi([],n)])
+ | Con.Lemma lemma ->
+ [P.Mtext([],"by");P.smallskip;P.Mi([],lemma.Con.lemma_name)]
+ | _ -> assert false) in
+ match proof.Con.proof_context with
+ `Hypothesis hyp1::`Hypothesis hyp2::tl ->
+ let get_name hyp =
+ (match hyp.Con.dec_name with
+ None -> "_"
+ | Some s -> s) in
+ let preshyp1 =
+ P.Mrow ([],
+ [P.Mtext([],"(");
+ P.Mi([],get_name hyp1);
+ P.Mtext([],")");
+ P.smallskip;
+ term2pres hyp1.Con.dec_type]) in
+ let preshyp2 =
+ P.Mrow ([],
+ [P.Mtext([],"(");
+ P.Mi([],get_name hyp2);
+ P.Mtext([],")");
+ P.smallskip;
+ term2pres hyp2.Con.dec_type]) in
+ (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} in *)
+ let body = conclude2pres proof.Con.proof_conclude false true in
+ let presacontext =
+ acontext2pres proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false in
+ P.Mtable
+ ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
+ None,"columnalign","left"],
+ [P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],
+ P.Mrow([],arg@[P.smallskip;P.Mtext([],"we have")]))]);
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],preshyp1)]);
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],P.Mtext([],"and"))]);
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],preshyp2)]);
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],presacontext)])]);
+ | _ -> assert false
+
+ and exists conclude =
+ let module P = Mpresentation in
+ let module Con = Content in
+ let proof_conclusion =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_conclusion with
+ None -> P.Mtext([],"No conclusion???")
+ | Some t -> term2pres t) in
+ let proof =
+ (match conclude.Con.conclude_args with
+ [Con.Aux(n);_;Con.ArgProof proof;_] -> proof
+ | _ -> assert false;
+ (*
+ List.map (ContentPp.parg 0) conclude.Con.conclude_args;
+ assert false *)) in
+ match proof.Con.proof_context with
+ `Declaration decl::`Hypothesis hyp::tl
+ | `Hypothesis decl::`Hypothesis hyp::tl ->
+ let get_name decl =
+ (match decl.Con.dec_name with
+ None -> "_"
+ | Some s -> s) in
+ let presdecl =
+ P.Mrow ([],
+ [P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"let");
+ P.smallskip;
+ P.Mi([],get_name decl);
+ P.Mtext([],":"); term2pres decl.Con.dec_type]) in
+ let suchthat =
+ P.Mrow ([],
+ [P.Mtext([None,"mathcolor","Red"],"such that");
+ P.smallskip;
+ P.Mtext([],"(");
+ P.Mi([],get_name hyp);
+ P.Mtext([],")");
+ P.smallskip;
+ term2pres hyp.Con.dec_type]) in
+ (* let body = proof2pres {proof with Con.proof_context = tl} in *)
+ let body = conclude2pres proof.Con.proof_conclude false true in
+ let presacontext =
+ acontext2pres proof.Con.proof_apply_context body false in
+ P.Mtable
+ ([None,"align","baseline 1"; None,"equalrows","false";
+ None,"columnalign","left"],
+ [P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],presdecl)]);
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],suchthat)]);
+ P.Mtr ([],[P.Mtd ([],presacontext)])]);
+ | _ -> assert false in
proof2pres p
;;
let module P = Mpresentation in
match obj with
`Def (K.Const,thesis,`Proof p) ->
- P.Mtable
+ p_mtable
[None,"align","baseline 1";
None,"equalrows","false";
None,"columnalign","left";
None,"helm:xref","id"]
- ([P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
- (P.Mrow []
- [P.Mtext []
+ ([p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
+ (p_mrow []
+ [p_mtext []
("UNFINISHED PROOF" ^ id ^"(" ^
String.concat " ; " (List.map UriManager.string_of_uri params)^
")")])] ;
- P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
- (P.Mrow []
- [P.Mtext [] "THESIS:"])] ;
- P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
- (P.Mrow []
- [P.Mphantom []
- (P.Mtext [] "__") ;
+ p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
+ (p_mrow []
+ [p_mtext [] "THESIS:"])] ;
+ p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
+ (p_mrow []
+ [p_mphantom []
+ (p_mtext [] "__") ;
term2pres thesis])]] @
(match metasenv with
None -> []
| Some metasenv' ->
- [P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
+ [p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
(* Conjectures are in their own table to make *)
(* diffing the DOM trees easier. *)
- (P.Mtable
+ (p_mtable
[None,"align","baseline 1";
None,"equalrows","false";
None,"columnalign","left"]
- ((P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
- (P.Mrow []
- [P.Mtext [] "CONJECTURES:"])])::
+ ((p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
+ (p_mrow []
+ [p_mtext [] "CONJECTURES:"])])::
List.map
(function
(id,n,context,ty) ->
- P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
- (P.Mrow [Some "helm", "xref", id]
+ p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
+ (p_mrow [Some "helm", "xref", id]
(List.map
(function
- (_,None) ->
- P.Mrow []
- [ P.Mi [] "_" ;
- P.Mo [] ":?" ;
- P.Mi [] "_"]
- | (_,Some (`Declaration d))
- | (_,Some (`Hypothesis d)) ->
+ None ->
+ p_mrow []
+ [ p_mi [] "_" ;
+ p_mo [] ":?" ;
+ p_mi [] "_"]
+ | Some (`Declaration d)
+ | Some (`Hypothesis d) ->
let
{ K.dec_name = dec_name ;
K.dec_type = ty } = d
in
- P.Mrow []
- [ P.Mi []
+ p_mrow []
+ [ p_mi []
(match dec_name with
None -> "_"
| Some n -> n) ;
- P.Mo [] ":" ;
+ p_mo [] ":" ;
term2pres ty]
- | (_,Some (`Definition d)) ->
+ | Some (`Definition d) ->
let
{ K.def_name = def_name ;
K.def_term = bo } = d
in
- P.Mrow []
- [ P.Mi []
+ p_mrow []
+ [ p_mi []
(match def_name with
None -> "_"
| Some n -> n) ;
- P.Mo [] ":=" ;
+ p_mo [] ":=" ;
term2pres bo]
- | (_,Some (`Proof p)) ->
+ | Some (`Proof p) ->
let proof_name = p.K.proof_name in
- P.Mrow []
- [ P.Mi []
+ p_mrow []
+ [ p_mi []
(match proof_name with
None -> "_"
| Some n -> n) ;
- P.Mo [] ":=" ;
+ p_mo [] ":=" ;
proof2pres term2pres p]
- ) context @
- [ P.Mo [] "|-" ] @
- [ P.Mi [] (string_of_int n) ;
- P.Mo [] ":" ;
+ ) (List.rev context) @
+ [ p_mo [] "|-" ] @
+ [ p_mi [] (string_of_int n) ;
+ p_mo [] ":" ;
term2pres ty ]
))
]
) metasenv'
))]]
) @
- [P.Mtr []
- [P.Mtd []
- (P.Mrow []
+ [p_mtr []
+ [p_mtd []
+ (p_mrow []
[proof2pres term2pres p])]])
| _ -> raise ToDo
;;
(Cexpr2pres.cexpr2pres_charcount
(Content_expressions.acic2cexpr ids_to_inner_sorts p)))
;;
+
projects / helm.git / blobdiff