* http://cs.unibo.it/helm/.
*)
+let search_theorems_in_context status =
+ let (proof, goal) = status in
+ let module C = Cic in
+ let module R = CicReduction in
+ let module S = CicSubstitution in
+ prerr_endline "Entro in search_context";
+ let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
+ let _,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
+ let rec find n = function
+ [] -> []
+ | hd::tl ->
+ let res =
+ try
+ Some (PrimitiveTactics.apply_tac status ~term:(C.Rel n))
+ with
+ ProofEngineTypes.Fail _ -> None in
+ (match res with
+ Some res -> res::(find (n+1) tl)
+ | None -> find (n+1) tl)
+ in
+ try
+ let res = find 1 context in
+ prerr_endline "Ho finito context";
+ res
+ with Failure s ->
+ prerr_endline ("SIAM QUI = " ^ s); []
+;;
+
+
+exception NotApplicableTheorem;;
+exception MaxDepth;;
+
+let depth = 5;;
+
+let rec auto_tac mqi_handle level proof goal =
+prerr_endline "Entro in Auto_rec";
+if level = 0 then
+ (* (proof, [goal]) *)
+ (prerr_endline ("NON ci credo");
+ raise MaxDepth)
+else
+ (* choices is a list of pairs proof and goallist *)
+ let choices =
+ (search_theorems_in_context (proof,goal))@
+ (TacticChaser.searchTheorems mqi_handle (proof,goal))
+ in
+ let rec try_choices = function
+ [] -> raise NotApplicableTheorem
+ | (proof,goallist)::tl ->
+prerr_endline ("GOALLIST = " ^ string_of_int (List.length goallist));
+ (try
+ List.fold_left
+ (fun proof goal ->
+ (* It may happen that to close the first open goal
+ also some other goals are closed *)
+ let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
+ if List.exists (fun (i,_,_) -> i = goal) metasenv then
+ let newproof =
+ auto_tac mqi_handle (level-1) proof goal
+ in
+ newproof
+ else
+ (* goal already closed *)
+ proof)
+ proof goallist
+ with
+ | MaxDepth
+ | NotApplicableTheorem ->
+ try_choices tl) in
+ try_choices choices;;
+
+let auto_tac mqi_handle (proof,goal) =
+ prerr_endline "Entro in Auto";
+ try
+ let proof = auto_tac mqi_handle depth proof goal in
+prerr_endline "AUTO_TAC HA FINITO";
+ (proof,[])
+ with
+ | MaxDepth -> assert false (* this should happens only if depth is 0 above *)
+ | NotApplicableTheorem ->
+ prerr_endline("No applicable theorem");
+ raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "No Applicable theorem");;
(* TODO se ce n'e' piu' di una, prende la prima che trova... sarebbe meglio
chiedere: find dovrebbe restituire una lista di hyp (?) da passare all'utonto con una
funzione di callback che restituisce la (sola) hyp da applicare *)
-let assumption_tac ~status:((proof,goal) as status) =
+let assumption_tac status =
+ let (proof, goal) = status in
let module C = Cic in
let module R = CicReduction in
let module S = CicSubstitution in
let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
- let _,context,ty = List.find (function (m,_,_) -> m=goal) metasenv in
+ let _,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let rec find n = function
hd::tl ->
(match hd with
| _ -> find (n+1) tl
)
| [] -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail "Assumption: No such assumption")
- in PrimitiveTactics.apply_tac ~status ~term:(C.Rel (find 1 context))
+ in PrimitiveTactics.apply_tac status ~term:(C.Rel (find 1 context))
;;
(* ANCORA DA DEBUGGARE *)
contesto e si lifta di tot... COSA SIGNIFICA TUTTO CIO'?????? *)
let generalize_tac
- ?(mk_fresh_name_callback = ProofEngineHelpers.mk_fresh_name)
- terms ~status:((proof,goal) as status)
+ ?(mk_fresh_name_callback = FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name)
+ terms status
=
+ let (proof, goal) = status in
let module C = Cic in
let module P = PrimitiveTactics in
let module T = Tacticals in
let _,metasenv,_,_ = proof in
- let _,context,ty = List.find (function (m,_,_) -> m=goal) metasenv in
+ let _,context,ty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in
let typ =
match terms with
[] -> assert false
~start:
(P.cut_tac
(C.Prod(
- (mk_fresh_name_callback context C.Anonymous typ),
+ (mk_fresh_name_callback metasenv context C.Anonymous typ),
typ,
(ProofEngineReduction.replace_lifting_csc 1
~equality:(==)
~where:ty)
)))
~continuations: [(P.apply_tac ~term:(C.Rel 1)) ; T.id_tac]
- ~status
+ status
;;