we reformulate the extended computation to simplify the proof of its

[helm.git] / matita / matita / contribs / lambdadelta / basic_2 / dynamic / snv_lift.ma

diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/dynamic/snv_lift.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/dynamic/snv_lift.ma
index 6d79ef571086474dc30eb177f1c0bb8684d5653a..ec9be23a4521e5cca5484f4f3c98084b51ccf5cd 100644 (file)
--- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/dynamic/snv_lift.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/dynamic/snv_lift.ma
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 (*                                                                        *)
 (**************************************************************************)
 
-include "basic_2/computation/xprs_lift.ma".
+include "basic_2/computation/dxprs_lift.ma".
 include "basic_2/equivalence/cpcs_cpcs.ma".
 include "basic_2/dynamic/snv.ma".
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ lemma snv_lift: ∀h,g,K,T. ⦃h, K⦄ ⊩ T :[g] → ∀L,d,e. ⇩[d, e] L ≡
   elim (lift_total T1 (d+1) e) #U1 #HTU1
   @(snv_appl … a … W0 … W1 … U1 l)
   [ /2 width=4/ | /2 width=4/ | /2 width=9/ | /2 width=9/ ]
-  @(xprs_lift … HLK … HTU … HT1) /2 width=1/
+  @(dxprs_lift … HLK … HTU … HT1) /2 width=1/
 | #K #V0 #T #V #l #_ #_ #HTV #HV0 #IHV0 #IHT #L #d #e #HLK #X #H
   elim (lift_inv_flat1 … H) -H #W0 #U #HVW0 #HTU #H destruct
   elim (lift_total V d e) #W #HVW
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ lemma snv_inv_lift: ∀h,g,L,U. ⦃h, L⦄ ⊩ U :[g] → ∀K,d,e. ⇩[d, e] L
   elim (lift_inv_flat2 … H) -H #V #T #HVW #HTU #H destruct
   elim (ssta_inv_lift1 … HW0 … HLK … HVW) -HW0 #V0 #HV0 #HVW0
   elim (cprs_inv_lift1 … HLK … HVW0 … HW01) -W0 #V1 #HVW1 #HV01
-  elim (xprs_inv_lift1 … HLK … HTU … HU1) -HU1 #X #H #HTU
+  elim (dxprs_inv_lift1 … HLK … HTU … HU1) -HU1 #X #H #HTU
   elim (lift_inv_bind2 … H) -H #Y #T1 #HY #HTU1 #H destruct
   lapply (lift_inj … HY … HVW1) -HY #H destruct /3 width=8/
 | #L #W0 #U #W #l #_ #_ #HUW #HW0 #IHW0 #IHU #K #d #e #HLK #X #H