- the trace is explicit in all auto tactics with depth > 1

[helm.git] / matita / matita / contribs / lambdadelta / basic_2 / multiple / drops.ma

diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/multiple/drops.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/multiple/drops.ma
index c6edbf3edea7b5fb856c983a34e956e000fea695..53253e55e3821720857fba64ede3819ed739cac1 100644 (file)
--- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/multiple/drops.ma
+++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/multiple/drops.ma
@@ -22,12 +22,12 @@ include "basic_2/multiple/lifts_vector.ma".
 
 inductive drops (s:bool): list2 nat nat → relation lenv ≝
 | drops_nil : ∀L. drops s (◊) L L
-| drops_cons: ∀L1,L,L2,des,l,m.
-              drops s des L1 L → ⬇[s, l, m] L ≡ L2 → drops s ({l, m} @ des) L1 L2
+| drops_cons: ∀L1,L,L2,cs,l,m.
+              drops s cs L1 L → ⬇[s, l, m] L ≡ L2 → drops s ({l, m} @ cs) L1 L2
 .
 
 interpretation "iterated slicing (local environment) abstract"
-   'RDropStar s des T1 T2 = (drops s des T1 T2).
+   'RDropStar s cs T1 T2 = (drops s cs T1 T2).
 (*
 interpretation "iterated slicing (local environment) general"
    'RDropStar des T1 T2 = (drops true des T1 T2).
@@ -38,57 +38,57 @@ definition d_liftable1: relation2 lenv term → predicate bool ≝
                         ∀U. ⬆[l, m] T ≡ U → R L U.
 
 definition d_liftables1: relation2 lenv term → predicate bool ≝
-                         λR,s. ∀L,K,des. ⬇*[s, des] L ≡ K →
-                         ∀T,U. ⬆*[des] T ≡ U → R K T → R L U.
+                         λR,s. ∀L,K,cs. ⬇*[s, cs] L ≡ K →
+                         ∀T,U. ⬆*[cs] T ≡ U → R K T → R L U.
 
 definition d_liftables1_all: relation2 lenv term → predicate bool ≝
-                             λR,s. ∀L,K,des. ⬇*[s, des] L ≡ K →
-                             ∀Ts,Us. ⬆*[des] Ts ≡ Us → 
+                             λR,s. ∀L,K,cs. ⬇*[s, cs] L ≡ K →
+                             ∀Ts,Us. ⬆*[cs] Ts ≡ Us → 
                              all … (R K) Ts → all … (R L) Us.
 
 (* Basic inversion lemmas ***************************************************)
 
-fact drops_inv_nil_aux: ∀L1,L2,s,des. ⬇*[s, des] L1 ≡ L2 → des = ◊ → L1 = L2.
-#L1 #L2 #s #des * -L1 -L2 -des //
-#L1 #L #L2 #l #m #des #_ #_ #H destruct
+fact drops_inv_nil_aux: ∀L1,L2,s,cs. ⬇*[s, cs] L1 ≡ L2 → cs = ◊ → L1 = L2.
+#L1 #L2 #s #cs * -L1 -L2 -cs //
+#L1 #L #L2 #l #m #cs #_ #_ #H destruct
 qed-.
 
 (* Basic_1: was: drop1_gen_pnil *)
 lemma drops_inv_nil: ∀L1,L2,s. ⬇*[s, ◊] L1 ≡ L2 → L1 = L2.
 /2 width=4 by drops_inv_nil_aux/ qed-.
 
-fact drops_inv_cons_aux: ∀L1,L2,s,des. ⬇*[s, des] L1 ≡ L2 →
-                         ∀l,m,tl. des = {l, m} @ tl →
+fact drops_inv_cons_aux: ∀L1,L2,s,cs. ⬇*[s, cs] L1 ≡ L2 →
+                         ∀l,m,tl. cs = {l, m} @ tl →
                          ∃∃L. ⬇*[s, tl] L1 ≡ L & ⬇[s, l, m] L ≡ L2.
-#L1 #L2 #s #des * -L1 -L2 -des
+#L1 #L2 #s #cs * -L1 -L2 -cs
 [ #L #l #m #tl #H destruct
-| #L1 #L #L2 #des #l #m #HT1 #HT2 #l0 #m0 #tl #H destruct
+| #L1 #L #L2 #cs #l #m #HT1 #HT2 #l0 #m0 #tl #H destruct
   /2 width=3 by ex2_intro/
 ]
 qed-.
 
 (* Basic_1: was: drop1_gen_pcons *)
-lemma drops_inv_cons: ∀L1,L2,s,l,m,des. ⬇*[s, {l, m} @ des] L1 ≡ L2 →
-                      ∃∃L. ⬇*[s, des] L1 ≡ L & ⬇[s, l, m] L ≡ L2.
+lemma drops_inv_cons: ∀L1,L2,s,l,m,cs. ⬇*[s, {l, m} @ cs] L1 ≡ L2 →
+                      ∃∃L. ⬇*[s, cs] L1 ≡ L & ⬇[s, l, m] L ≡ L2.
 /2 width=3 by drops_inv_cons_aux/ qed-.
 
-lemma drops_inv_skip2: ∀I,s,des,des2,i. des ▭ i ≡ des2 →
-                       ∀L1,K2,V2. ⬇*[s, des2] L1 ≡ K2. ⓑ{I} V2 →
-                       ∃∃K1,V1,des1. des + 1 ▭ i + 1 ≡ des1 + 1 &
-                                     ⬇*[s, des1] K1 ≡ K2 &
-                                     ⬆*[des1] V2 ≡ V1 &
+lemma drops_inv_skip2: ∀I,s,cs,cs2,i. cs ▭ i ≡ cs2 →
+                       ∀L1,K2,V2. ⬇*[s, cs2] L1 ≡ K2. ⓑ{I} V2 →
+                       ∃∃K1,V1,cs1. cs + 1 ▭ i + 1 ≡ cs1 + 1 &
+                                     ⬇*[s, cs1] K1 ≡ K2 &
+                                     ⬆*[cs1] V2 ≡ V1 &
                                      L1 = K1. ⓑ{I} V1.
-#I #s #des #des2 #i #H elim H -des -des2 -i
+#I #s #cs #cs2 #i #H elim H -cs -cs2 -i
 [ #i #L1 #K2 #V2 #H
   >(drops_inv_nil … H) -L1 /2 width=7 by lifts_nil, minuss_nil, ex4_3_intro, drops_nil/
-| #des #des2 #l #m #i #Hil #_ #IHcs2 #L1 #K2 #V2 #H
+| #cs #cs2 #l #m #i #Hil #_ #IHcs2 #L1 #K2 #V2 #H
   elim (drops_inv_cons … H) -H #L #HL1 #H
   elim (drop_inv_skip2 … H) -H /2 width=1 by lt_plus_to_minus_r/ #K #V >minus_plus #HK2 #HV2 #H destruct
-  elim (IHcs2 … HL1) -IHcs2 -HL1 #K1 #V1 #des1 #Hcs1 #HK1 #HV1 #X destruct
+  elim (IHcs2 … HL1) -IHcs2 -HL1 #K1 #V1 #cs1 #Hcs1 #HK1 #HV1 #X destruct
   @(ex4_3_intro … K1 V1 … ) // [3,4: /2 width=7 by lifts_cons, drops_cons/ | skip ]
   normalize >plus_minus /3 width=1 by minuss_lt, lt_minus_to_plus/ (**) (* explicit constructors *)
-| #des #des2 #l #m #i #Hil #_ #IHcs2 #L1 #K2 #V2 #H
-  elim (IHcs2 … H) -IHcs2 -H #K1 #V1 #des1 #Hcs1 #HK1 #HV1 #X destruct
+| #cs #cs2 #l #m #i #Hil #_ #IHcs2 #L1 #K2 #V2 #H
+  elim (IHcs2 … H) -IHcs2 -H #K1 #V1 #cs1 #Hcs1 #HK1 #HV1 #X destruct
   /4 width=7 by minuss_ge, ex4_3_intro, le_S_S/
 ]
 qed-.
@@ -96,26 +96,26 @@ qed-.
 (* Basic properties *********************************************************)
 
 (* Basic_1: was: drop1_skip_bind *)
-lemma drops_skip: ∀L1,L2,s,des. ⬇*[s, des] L1 ≡ L2 → ∀V1,V2. ⬆*[des] V2 ≡ V1 →
-                  ∀I. ⬇*[s, des + 1] L1.ⓑ{I}V1 ≡ L2.ⓑ{I}V2.
-#L1 #L2 #s #des #H elim H -L1 -L2 -des
+lemma drops_skip: ∀L1,L2,s,cs. ⬇*[s, cs] L1 ≡ L2 → ∀V1,V2. ⬆*[cs] V2 ≡ V1 →
+                  ∀I. ⬇*[s, cs + 1] L1.ⓑ{I}V1 ≡ L2.ⓑ{I}V2.
+#L1 #L2 #s #cs #H elim H -L1 -L2 -cs
 [ #L #V1 #V2 #HV12 #I
   >(lifts_inv_nil … HV12) -HV12 //
-| #L1 #L #L2 #des #l #m #_ #HL2 #IHL #V1 #V2 #H #I
+| #L1 #L #L2 #cs #l #m #_ #HL2 #IHL #V1 #V2 #H #I
   elim (lifts_inv_cons … H) -H /3 width=5 by drop_skip, drops_cons/
 ].
 qed.
 
 lemma d1_liftable_liftables: ∀R,s. d_liftable1 R s → d_liftables1 R s.
-#R #s #HR #L #K #des #H elim H -L -K -des
+#R #s #HR #L #K #cs #H elim H -L -K -cs
 [ #L #T #U #H #HT <(lifts_inv_nil … H) -H //
-| #L1 #L #L2 #des #l #m #_ #HL2 #IHL #T2 #T1 #H #HLT2
+| #L1 #L #L2 #cs #l #m #_ #HL2 #IHL #T2 #T1 #H #HLT2
   elim (lifts_inv_cons … H) -H /3 width=10 by/
 ]
 qed.
 
 lemma d1_liftables_liftables_all: ∀R,s. d_liftables1 R s → d_liftables1_all R s.
-#R #s #HR #L #K #des #HLK #Ts #Us #H elim H -Ts -Us normalize //
+#R #s #HR #L #K #cs #HLK #Ts #Us #H elim H -Ts -Us normalize //
 #Ts #Us #T #U #HTU #_ #IHTUs * /3 width=7 by conj/
 qed.