\ / GNU General Public License Version 2
V_______________________________________________________________ *)
+include "basics/core_notation/pair_2.ma".
include "basics/logic.ma".
(* void *)
(* unit *)
inductive unit : Type[0] ≝ it: unit.
-(* Prod *)
-inductive Prod (A,B:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
-pair : A → B → Prod A B.
+(* sum *)
+inductive Sum (A,B:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
+ inl : A → Sum A B
+| inr : B → Sum A B.
+
+interpretation "Disjoint union" 'plus A B = (Sum A B).
-interpretation "Pair construction" 'pair x y = (pair ? ? x y).
+(* option *)
+inductive option (A:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
+ None : option A
+ | Some : A → option A.
-interpretation "Product" 'product x y = (Prod x y).
+definition option_map : ∀A,B:Type[0]. (A → B) → option A → option B ≝
+λA,B,f,o. match o with [ None ⇒ None B | Some a ⇒ Some B (f a) ].
+
+lemma option_map_none : ∀A,B,f,x.
+ option_map A B f x = None B → x = None A.
+#A #B #f * [ // | #a #E whd in E:(??%?); destruct ]
+qed.
+
+lemma option_map_some : ∀A,B,f,x,v.
+ option_map A B f x = Some B v → ∃y. x = Some ? y ∧ f y = v.
+#A #B #f *
+[ #v normalize #E destruct
+| #y #v normalize #E %{y} destruct % //
+] qed.
+
+definition option_map_def : ∀A,B:Type[0]. (A → B) → B → option A → B ≝
+λA,B,f,d,o. match o with [ None ⇒ d | Some a ⇒ f a ].
+
+lemma refute_none_by_refl : ∀A,B:Type[0]. ∀P:A → B. ∀Q:B → Type[0]. ∀x:option A. ∀H:x = None ? → False.
+ (∀v. x = Some ? v → Q (P v)) →
+ Q (match x return λy.x = y → ? with [ Some v ⇒ λ_. P v | None ⇒ λE. match H E in False with [ ] ] (refl ? x)).
+#A #B #P #Q *
+[ #H cases (H (refl ??))
+| #a #H #p normalize @p @refl
+] qed.
+
+(* dependent pair *)
+record DPair (A:Type[0]) (f:A→Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝ {
+ dpi1:> A
+ ; dpi2: f dpi1
+ }.
+
+interpretation "DPair" 'dpair x = (DPair ? x).
+
+interpretation "mk_DPair" 'mk_DPair x y = (mk_DPair ?? x y).
+
+(* sigma *)
+record Sig (A:Type[0]) (f:A→Prop) : Type[0] ≝ {
+ pi1: A (* not a coercion due to problems with Cerco *)
+ ; pi2: f pi1
+ }.
+
+interpretation "Sigma" 'sigma x = (Sig ? x).
+
+interpretation "mk_Sig" 'dp x y = (mk_Sig ?? x y).
-definition fst ≝ λA,B.λp:A × B.
- match p with [pair a b ⇒ a].
+lemma sub_pi2 : ∀A.∀P,P':A → Prop. (∀x.P x → P' x) → ∀x:Σx:A.P x. P' (pi1 … x).
+#A #P #P' #H1 * #x #H2 @H1 @H2
+qed.
-definition snd ≝ λA,B.λp:A × B.
- match p with [pair a b ⇒ b].
+lemma inj_mk_Sig: ∀A,P.∀x. x = mk_Sig A P (pi1 A P x) (pi2 A P x).
+#A #P #x cases x //
+qed-.
+(* Prod *)
+
+record Prod (A,B:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝ {
+ fst: A
+ ; snd: B
+ }.
+
+interpretation "Pair construction" 'pair x y = (mk_Prod ? ? x y).
+
+interpretation "Product" 'product x y = (Prod x y).
interpretation "pair pi1" 'pi1 = (fst ? ?).
interpretation "pair pi2" 'pi2 = (snd ? ?).
interpretation "pair pi1" 'pi1b x y = (fst ? ? x y).
interpretation "pair pi2" 'pi2b x y = (snd ? ? x y).
+notation "π1" with precedence 10 for @{ (proj1 ??) }.
+notation "π2" with precedence 10 for @{ (proj2 ??) }.
+
+(* Yeah, I probably ought to do something more general... *)
+notation "hvbox(\langle term 19 a, break term 19 b, break term 19 c\rangle)"
+with precedence 90 for @{ 'triple $a $b $c}.
+interpretation "Triple construction" 'triple x y z = (mk_Prod ? ? (mk_Prod ? ? x y) z).
+
+notation "hvbox(\langle term 19 a, break term 19 b, break term 19 c, break term 19 d\rangle)"
+with precedence 90 for @{ 'quadruple $a $b $c $d}.
+interpretation "Quadruple construction" 'quadruple w x y z = (mk_Prod ? ? (mk_Prod ? ? w x) (mk_Prod ? ? y z)).
+
+
theorem eq_pair_fst_snd: ∀A,B.∀p:A × B.
p = 〈 \fst p, \snd p 〉.
#A #B #p (cases p) // qed.
lemma snd_eq : ∀A,B.∀a:A.∀b:B. \snd 〈a,b〉 = b.
// qed.
-(* sum *)
-inductive Sum (A,B:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
- inl : A → Sum A B
-| inr : B → Sum A B.
-
-interpretation "Disjoint union" 'plus A B = (Sum A B).
-
-(* option *)
-inductive option (A:Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
- None : option A
- | Some : A → option A.
-
-(* sigma *)
-inductive Sig (A:Type[0]) (f:A→Type[0]) : Type[0] ≝
- dp: ∀a:A.(f a)→Sig A f.
-
-interpretation "Sigma" 'sigma x = (Sig ? x).
+notation > "hvbox('let' 〈ident x,ident y〉 ≝ t 'in' s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t with [ mk_Prod ${ident x} ${ident y} ⇒ $s ] }.
+
+notation < "hvbox('let' \nbsp hvbox(〈ident x,ident y〉 \nbsp≝ break t \nbsp 'in' \nbsp) break s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t with [ mk_Prod (${ident x}:$X) (${ident y}:$Y) ⇒ $s ] }.
+
+(* Also extracts an equality proof (useful when not using Russell). *)
+notation > "hvbox('let' 〈ident x,ident y〉 'as' ident E ≝ t 'in' s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t return λx.x = $t → ? with [ mk_Prod ${ident x} ${ident y} ⇒
+ λ${ident E}.$s ] (refl ? $t) }.
+
+notation < "hvbox('let' \nbsp hvbox(〈ident x,ident y〉 \nbsp 'as'\nbsp ident E\nbsp ≝ break t \nbsp 'in' \nbsp) break s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t return λ${ident k}:$X.$eq $T $k $t → ? with [ mk_Prod (${ident x}:$U) (${ident y}:$W) ⇒
+ λ${ident E}:$e.$s ] ($refl $T $t) }.
+
+notation > "hvbox('let' 〈ident x,ident y,ident z〉 'as' ident E ≝ t 'in' s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t return λx.x = $t → ? with [ mk_Prod ${fresh xy} ${ident z} ⇒
+ match ${fresh xy} return λx. ? = $t → ? with [ mk_Prod ${ident x} ${ident y} ⇒
+ λ${ident E}.$s ] ] (refl ? $t) }.
+
+notation < "hvbox('let' \nbsp hvbox(〈ident x,ident y,ident z〉 \nbsp 'as' \nbsp ident E\nbsp ≝ break t \nbsp 'in' \nbsp) break s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t return λ${ident k}:$X.$eq $T $k $t → $U with [ mk_Prod (${ident xy}:$V) (${ident z}:$Z) ⇒
+ match $xy return λ${ident a}. $eq $R $r $t → ? with [ mk_Prod (${ident x}:$L) (${ident y}:$I) ⇒
+ λ${ident E}:$J.$s ] ] ($refl $A $t) }.
+
+notation > "hvbox('let' 〈ident w,ident x,ident y,ident z〉 ≝ t 'in' s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t with [ mk_Prod ${fresh wx} ${fresh yz} ⇒ match ${fresh wx} with [ mk_Prod ${ident w} ${ident x} ⇒ match ${fresh yz} with [ mk_Prod ${ident y} ${ident z} ⇒ $s ] ] ] }.
+
+notation > "hvbox('let' 〈ident x,ident y,ident z〉 ≝ t 'in' s)"
+ with precedence 10
+for @{ match $t with [ mk_Prod ${fresh xy} ${ident z} ⇒ match ${fresh xy} with [ mk_Prod ${ident x} ${ident y} ⇒ $s ] ] }.
+
+(* This appears to upset automation (previously provable results require greater
+ depth or just don't work), so use example rather than lemma to prevent it
+ being indexed. *)
+example contract_pair : ∀A,B.∀e:A×B. (let 〈a,b〉 ≝ e in 〈a,b〉) = e.
+#A #B * // qed.
+
+lemma extract_pair : ∀A,B,C,D. ∀u:A×B. ∀Q:A → B → C×D. ∀x,y.
+((let 〈a,b〉 ≝ u in Q a b) = 〈x,y〉) →
+∃a,b. 〈a,b〉 = u ∧ Q a b = 〈x,y〉.
+#A #B #C #D * #a #b #Q #x #y normalize #E1 %{a} %{b} % try @refl @E1 qed.
+
+lemma breakup_pair : ∀A,B,C:Type[0].∀x. ∀R:C → Prop. ∀P:A → B → C.
+ R (P (\fst x) (\snd x)) → R (let 〈a,b〉 ≝ x in P a b).
+#A #B #C *; normalize /2/
+qed.
+
+lemma pair_elim:
+ ∀A,B,C: Type[0].
+ ∀T: A → B → C.
+ ∀p.
+ ∀P: A×B → C → Prop.
+ (∀lft, rgt. p = 〈lft,rgt〉 → P 〈lft,rgt〉 (T lft rgt)) →
+ P p (let 〈lft, rgt〉 ≝ p in T lft rgt).
+ #A #B #C #T * /2/
+qed.
+
+lemma pair_elim2:
+ ∀A,B,C,C': Type[0].
+ ∀T: A → B → C.
+ ∀T': A → B → C'.
+ ∀p.
+ ∀P: A×B → C → C' → Prop.
+ (∀lft, rgt. p = 〈lft,rgt〉 → P 〈lft,rgt〉 (T lft rgt) (T' lft rgt)) →
+ P p (let 〈lft, rgt〉 ≝ p in T lft rgt) (let 〈lft, rgt〉 ≝ p in T' lft rgt).
+ #A #B #C #C' #T #T' * /2/
+qed.
+
+(* Useful for avoiding destruct's full normalization. *)
+lemma pair_eq1: ∀A,B. ∀a1,a2:A. ∀b1,b2:B. 〈a1,b1〉 = 〈a2,b2〉 → a1 = a2.
+#A #B #a1 #a2 #b1 #b2 #H destruct //
+qed.
+
+lemma pair_eq2: ∀A,B. ∀a1,a2:A. ∀b1,b2:B. 〈a1,b1〉 = 〈a2,b2〉 → b1 = b2.
+#A #B #a1 #a2 #b1 #b2 #H destruct //
+qed.
+
+lemma pair_destruct_1:
+ ∀A,B.∀a:A.∀b:B.∀c. 〈a,b〉 = c → a = \fst c.
+ #A #B #a #b *; /2/
+qed.
+
+lemma pair_destruct_2:
+ ∀A,B.∀a:A.∀b:B.∀c. 〈a,b〉 = c → b = \snd c.
+ #A #B #a #b *; /2/
+qed.
+
+lemma coerc_pair_sigma:
+ ∀A,B,P. ∀p:A × B. P (\snd p) → A × (Σx:B.P x).
+#A #B #P * #a #b #p % [@a | /2/]
+qed.
+coercion coerc_pair_sigma:∀A,B,P. ∀p:A × B. P (\snd p) → A × (Σx:B.P x)
+≝ coerc_pair_sigma on p: (? × ?) to (? × (Sig ??)).
projects / helm.git / blobdiff