-(**************************************************************************)
-(* ___ *)
-(* ||M|| *)
-(* ||A|| A project by Andrea Asperti *)
-(* ||T|| *)
-(* ||I|| Developers: *)
-(* ||T|| The HELM team. *)
-(* ||A|| http://helm.cs.unibo.it *)
-(* \ / *)
-(* \ / This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
-(* v GNU General Public License Version 2 *)
-(* *)
-(**************************************************************************)
+(* boolean functions over lists *)
-include "re/lang.ma".
+include "basics/list.ma".
+include "basics/sets.ma".
+include "basics/deqsets.ma".
-inductive re (S: DeqSet) : Type[0] ≝
- z: re S
- | e: re S
- | s: S → re S
- | c: re S → re S → re S
- | o: re S → re S → re S
- | k: re S → re S.
+(********* search *********)
-interpretation "re epsilon" 'epsilon = (e ?).
-interpretation "re or" 'plus a b = (o ? a b).
-interpretation "re cat" 'middot a b = (c ? a b).
-interpretation "re star" 'star a = (k ? a).
-
-notation < "a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}.
-notation > "` term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}.
-interpretation "atom" 'ps a = (s ? a).
-
-notation "`∅" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'empty }.
-interpretation "empty" 'empty = (z ?).
-
-let rec in_l (S : DeqSet) (r : re S) on r : word S → Prop ≝
-match r with
-[ z ⇒ ∅
-| e ⇒ {ϵ}
-| s x ⇒ {[x]}
-| c r1 r2 ⇒ (in_l ? r1) · (in_l ? r2)
-| o r1 r2 ⇒ (in_l ? r1) ∪ (in_l ? r2)
-| k r1 ⇒ (in_l ? r1) ^*].
-
-notation "\sem{term 19 E}" non associative with precedence 75 for @{'in_l $E}.
-interpretation "in_l" 'in_l E = (in_l ? E).
-interpretation "in_l mem" 'mem w l = (in_l ? l w).
-
-lemma rsem_star : ∀S.∀r: re S. \sem{r^*} = \sem{r}^*.
-// qed.
-
-
-(* pointed items *)
-inductive pitem (S: DeqSet) : Type[0] ≝
- pz: pitem S
- | pe: pitem S
- | ps: S → pitem S
- | pp: S → pitem S
- | pc: pitem S → pitem S → pitem S
- | po: pitem S → pitem S → pitem S
- | pk: pitem S → pitem S.
-
-definition pre ≝ λS.pitem S × bool.
-
-interpretation "pitem star" 'star a = (pk ? a).
-interpretation "pitem or" 'plus a b = (po ? a b).
-interpretation "pitem cat" 'middot a b = (pc ? a b).
-notation < ".a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}.
-notation > "`. term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}.
-interpretation "pitem pp" 'pp a = (pp ? a).
-interpretation "pitem ps" 'ps a = (ps ? a).
-interpretation "pitem epsilon" 'epsilon = (pe ?).
-interpretation "pitem empty" 'empty = (pz ?).
-
-let rec forget (S: DeqSet) (l : pitem S) on l: re S ≝
- match l with
- [ pz ⇒ `∅
- | pe ⇒ ϵ
- | ps x ⇒ `x
- | pp x ⇒ `x
- | pc E1 E2 ⇒ (forget ? E1) · (forget ? E2)
- | po E1 E2 ⇒ (forget ? E1) + (forget ? E2)
- | pk E ⇒ (forget ? E)^* ].
-
-(* notation < "|term 19 e|" non associative with precedence 70 for @{'forget $e}.*)
-interpretation "forget" 'norm a = (forget ? a).
-
-let rec in_pl (S : DeqSet) (r : pitem S) on r : word S → Prop ≝
-match r with
-[ pz ⇒ ∅
-| pe ⇒ ∅
-| ps _ ⇒ ∅
-| pp x ⇒ { [x] }
-| pc r1 r2 ⇒ (in_pl ? r1) · \sem{forget ? r2} ∪ (in_pl ? r2)
-| po r1 r2 ⇒ (in_pl ? r1) ∪ (in_pl ? r2)
-| pk r1 ⇒ (in_pl ? r1) · \sem{forget ? r1}^* ].
-
-interpretation "in_pl" 'in_l E = (in_pl ? E).
-interpretation "in_pl mem" 'mem w l = (in_pl ? l w).
-
-definition in_prl ≝ λS : DeqSet.λp:pre S.
- if (\snd p) then \sem{\fst p} ∪ {ϵ} else \sem{\fst p}.
-
-interpretation "in_prl mem" 'mem w l = (in_prl ? l w).
-interpretation "in_prl" 'in_l E = (in_prl ? E).
-
-lemma sem_pre_true : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
- \sem{〈i,true〉} = \sem{i} ∪ {ϵ}.
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_pre_false : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
- \sem{〈i,false〉} = \sem{i}.
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_cat: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- \sem{i1 · i2} = \sem{i1} · \sem{|i2|} ∪ \sem{i2}.
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_cat_w: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀w.
- \sem{i1 · i2} w = ((\sem{i1} · \sem{|i2|}) w ∨ \sem{i2} w).
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_plus: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- \sem{i1 + i2} = \sem{i1} ∪ \sem{i2}.
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_plus_w: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀w.
- \sem{i1 + i2} w = (\sem{i1} w ∨ \sem{i2} w).
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_star : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
- \sem{i^*} = \sem{i} · \sem{|i|}^*.
-// qed.
-
-lemma sem_star_w : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.∀w.
- \sem{i^*} w = (∃w1,w2.w1 @ w2 = w ∧ \sem{i} w1 ∧ \sem{|i|}^* w2).
-// qed.
+let rec memb (S:DeqSet) (x:S) (l: list S) on l ≝
+ match l with
+ [ nil ⇒ false
+ | cons a tl ⇒ (x == a) ∨ memb S x tl
+ ].
-lemma append_eq_nil : ∀S.∀w1,w2:word S. w1 @ w2 = ϵ → w1 = ϵ.
-#S #w1 #w2 cases w1 // #a #tl normalize #H destruct qed.
+notation < "\memb x l" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'memb $x $l}.
+interpretation "boolean membership" 'memb a l = (memb ? a l).
-lemma not_epsilon_lp : ∀S:DeqSet.∀e:pitem S. ¬ (ϵ ∈ e).
-#S #e elim e normalize /2/
- [#r1 #r2 * #n1 #n2 % * /2/ * #w1 * #w2 * * #H
- >(append_eq_nil …H…) /2/
- |#r1 #r2 #n1 #n2 % * /2/
- |#r #n % * #w1 * #w2 * * #H >(append_eq_nil …H…) /2/
- ]
+lemma memb_hd: ∀S,a,l. memb S a (a::l) = true.
+#S #a #l normalize >(proj2 … (eqb_true S …) (refl S a)) //
qed.
-(* lemma 12 *)
-lemma epsilon_to_true : ∀S.∀e:pre S. ϵ ∈ e → \snd e = true.
-#S * #i #b cases b // normalize #H @False_ind /2/
+lemma memb_cons: ∀S,a,b,l.
+ memb S a l = true → memb S a (b::l) = true.
+#S #a #b #l normalize cases (a==b) normalize //
qed.
-lemma true_to_epsilon : ∀S.∀e:pre S. \snd e = true → ϵ ∈ e.
-#S * #i #b #btrue normalize in btrue; >btrue %2 //
+lemma memb_single: ∀S,a,x. memb S a [x] = true → a = x.
+#S #a #x normalize cases (true_or_false … (a==x)) #H
+ [#_ >(\P H) // |>H normalize #abs @False_ind /2/]
qed.
-definition lo ≝ λS:DeqSet.λa,b:pre S.〈\fst a + \fst b,\snd a ∨ \snd b〉.
-notation "a ⊕ b" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'oplus $a $b}.
-interpretation "oplus" 'oplus a b = (lo ? a b).
+lemma memb_append: ∀S,a,l1,l2.
+memb S a (l1@l2) = true →
+ memb S a l1= true ∨ memb S a l2 = true.
+#S #a #l1 elim l1 normalize [#l2 #H %2 //]
+#b #tl #Hind #l2 cases (a==b) normalize /2/
+qed.
-lemma lo_def: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b1,b2. 〈i1,b1〉⊕〈i2,b2〉=〈i1+i2,b1∨b2〉.
-// qed.
+lemma memb_append_l1: ∀S,a,l1,l2.
+ memb S a l1= true → memb S a (l1@l2) = true.
+#S #a #l1 elim l1 normalize
+ [normalize #le #abs @False_ind /2/
+ |#b #tl #Hind #l2 cases (a==b) normalize /2/
+ ]
+qed.
+
+lemma memb_append_l2: ∀S,a,l1,l2.
+ memb S a l2= true → memb S a (l1@l2) = true.
+#S #a #l1 elim l1 normalize //
+#b #tl #Hind #l2 cases (a==b) normalize /2/
+qed.
+
+lemma memb_exists: ∀S,a,l.memb S a l = true →
+ ∃l1,l2.l=l1@(a::l2).
+#S #a #l elim l [normalize #abs @False_ind /2/]
+#b #tl #Hind #H cases (orb_true_l … H)
+ [#eqba @(ex_intro … (nil S)) @(ex_intro … tl) >(\P eqba) //
+ |#mem_tl cases (Hind mem_tl) #l1 * #l2 #eqtl
+ @(ex_intro … (b::l1)) @(ex_intro … l2) >eqtl //
+ ]
+qed.
-definition pre_concat_r ≝ λS:DeqSet.λi:pitem S.λe:pre S.
- match e with [ mk_Prod i1 b ⇒ 〈i · i1, b〉].
+lemma not_memb_to_not_eq: ∀S,a,b,l.
+ memb S a l = false → memb S b l = true → a==b = false.
+#S #a #b #l cases (true_or_false (a==b)) //
+#eqab >(\P eqab) #H >H #abs @False_ind /2/
+qed.
-notation "i ◂ e" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'ltrif $i $e}.
-interpretation "pre_concat_r" 'ltrif i e = (pre_concat_r ? i e).
-
-lemma eq_to_ex_eq: ∀S.∀A,B:word S → Prop.
- A = B → A =1 B.
-#S #A #B #H >H /2/ qed.
-
-lemma sem_pre_concat_r : ∀S,i.∀e:pre S.
- \sem{i ◂ e} =1 \sem{i} · \sem{|\fst e|} ∪ \sem{e}.
-#S #i * #i1 #b1 cases b1 [2: @eq_to_ex_eq //]
->sem_pre_true >sem_cat >sem_pre_true /2/
+lemma memb_map: ∀S1,S2,f,a,l. memb S1 a l= true →
+ memb S2 (f a) (map … f l) = true.
+#S1 #S2 #f #a #l elim l normalize [//]
+#x #tl #memba cases (true_or_false (a==x))
+ [#eqx >eqx >(\P eqx) >(\b (refl … (f x))) normalize //
+ |#eqx >eqx cases (f a==f x) normalize /2/
+ ]
qed.
-
-definition lc ≝ λS:DeqSet.λbcast:∀S:DeqSet.pitem S → pre S.λe1:pre S.λi2:pitem S.
- match e1 with
- [ mk_Prod i1 b1 ⇒ match b1 with
- [ true ⇒ (i1 ◂ (bcast ? i2))
- | false ⇒ 〈i1 · i2,false〉
- ]
- ].
-
-definition lift ≝ λS.λf:pitem S →pre S.λe:pre S.
- match e with
- [ mk_Prod i b ⇒ 〈\fst (f i), \snd (f i) ∨ b〉].
-
-notation "a ▸ b" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'lc eclose $a $b}.
-interpretation "lc" 'lc op a b = (lc ? op a b).
-
-definition lk ≝ λS:DeqSet.λbcast:∀S:DeqSet.∀E:pitem S.pre S.λe:pre S.
- match e with
- [ mk_Prod i1 b1 ⇒
- match b1 with
- [true ⇒ 〈(\fst (bcast ? i1))^*, true〉
- |false ⇒ 〈i1^*,false〉
- ]
- ].
-
-(* notation < "a \sup ⊛" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'lk $op $a}.*)
-interpretation "lk" 'lk op a = (lk ? op a).
-notation "a^⊛" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'lk eclose $a}.
-
-notation "•" non associative with precedence 60 for @{eclose ?}.
-let rec eclose (S: DeqSet) (i: pitem S) on i : pre S ≝
- match i with
- [ pz ⇒ 〈 `∅, false 〉
- | pe ⇒ 〈 ϵ, true 〉
- | ps x ⇒ 〈 `.x, false〉
- | pp x ⇒ 〈 `.x, false 〉
- | po i1 i2 ⇒ •i1 ⊕ •i2
- | pc i1 i2 ⇒ •i1 ▸ i2
- | pk i ⇒ 〈(\fst (•i))^*,true〉].
-
-notation "• x" non associative with precedence 60 for @{'eclose $x}.
-interpretation "eclose" 'eclose x = (eclose ? x).
-
-lemma eclose_plus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- •(i1 + i2) = •i1 ⊕ •i2.
-// qed.
-
-lemma eclose_dot: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- •(i1 · i2) = •i1 ▸ i2.
-// qed.
-
-lemma eclose_star: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i:pitem S.
- •i^* = 〈(\fst(•i))^*,true〉.
-// qed.
-
-definition reclose ≝ λS. lift S (eclose S).
-interpretation "reclose" 'eclose x = (reclose ? x).
-
-(* theorem 16: 2 *)
-lemma sem_oplus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1,e2:pre S.
- \sem{e1 ⊕ e2} =1 \sem{e1} ∪ \sem{e2}.
-#S * #i1 #b1 * #i2 #b2 #w %
- [cases b1 cases b2 normalize /2/ * /3/ * /3/
- |cases b1 cases b2 normalize /2/ * /3/ * /3/
+lemma memb_compose: ∀S1,S2,S3,op,a1,a2,l1,l2.
+ memb S1 a1 l1 = true → memb S2 a2 l2 = true →
+ memb S3 (op a1 a2) (compose S1 S2 S3 op l1 l2) = true.
+#S1 #S2 #S3 #op #a1 #a2 #l1 elim l1 [normalize //]
+#x #tl #Hind #l2 #memba1 #memba2 cases (orb_true_l … memba1)
+ [#eqa1 >(\P eqa1) @memb_append_l1 @memb_map //
+ |#membtl @memb_append_l2 @Hind //
]
qed.
-lemma odot_true :
- ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- 〈i1,true〉 ▸ i2 = i1 ◂ (•i2).
-// qed.
-
-lemma odot_true_bis :
- ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- 〈i1,true〉 ▸ i2 = 〈i1 · \fst (•i2), \snd (•i2)〉.
-#S #i1 #i2 normalize cases (•i2) // qed.
-
-lemma odot_false:
- ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- 〈i1,false〉 ▸ i2 = 〈i1 · i2, false〉.
-// qed.
-
-lemma LcatE : ∀S.∀e1,e2:pitem S.
- \sem{e1 · e2} = \sem{e1} · \sem{|e2|} ∪ \sem{e2}.
-// qed.
-
-lemma erase_dot : ∀S.∀e1,e2:pitem S. |e1 · e2| = c ? (|e1|) (|e2|).
-// qed.
+(**************** unicity test *****************)
-lemma erase_plus : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.
- |i1 + i2| = |i1| + |i2|.
-// qed.
-
-lemma erase_star : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.|i^*| = |i|^*.
-// qed.
-
-lemma erase_bull : ∀S.∀i:pitem S. |\fst (•i)| = |i|.
-#S #i elim i //
- [ #i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >erase_dot <IH1 >eclose_dot
- cases (•i1) #i11 #b1 cases b1 // <IH2 >odot_true_bis //
- | #i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_plus >(erase_plus … i1) <IH1 <IH2
- cases (•i1) #i11 #b1 cases (•i2) #i21 #b2 //
- | #i #IH >eclose_star >(erase_star … i) <IH cases (•i) //
- ]
-qed.
-
-lemma sem_eclose_star: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i:pitem S.
- \sem{〈i^*,true〉} =1 \sem{〈i,false〉}·\sem{|i|}^* ∪ {ϵ}.
-/2/ qed.
+let rec uniqueb (S:DeqSet) l on l : bool ≝
+ match l with
+ [ nil ⇒ true
+ | cons a tl ⇒ notb (memb S a tl) ∧ uniqueb S tl
+ ].
-(* theorem 16: 1 → 3 *)
-lemma odot_dot_aux : ∀S.∀e1:pre S.∀i2:pitem S.
- \sem{•i2} =1 \sem{i2} ∪ \sem{|i2|} →
- \sem{e1 ▸ i2} =1 \sem{e1} · \sem{|i2|} ∪ \sem{i2}.
-#S * #i1 #b1 #i2 cases b1
- [2:#th >odot_false >sem_pre_false >sem_pre_false >sem_cat /2/
- |#H >odot_true >sem_pre_true @(eqP_trans … (sem_pre_concat_r …))
- >erase_bull @eqP_trans [|@(eqP_union_l … H)]
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_l[|@union_comm ]]
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_sym @union_assoc ] /3/
- ]
-qed.
+(* unique_append l1 l2 add l1 in fornt of l2, but preserving unicity *)
-lemma sem_fst: ∀S.∀e:pre S. \sem{\fst e} =1 \sem{e}-{[ ]}.
-#S * #i *
- [>sem_pre_true normalize in ⊢ (??%?); #w %
- [/3/ | * * // #H1 #H2 @False_ind @(absurd …H1 H2)]
- |>sem_pre_false normalize in ⊢ (??%?); #w % [ /3/ | * // ]
- ]
-qed.
+let rec unique_append (S:DeqSet) (l1,l2: list S) on l1 ≝
+ match l1 with
+ [ nil ⇒ l2
+ | cons a tl ⇒
+ let r ≝ unique_append S tl l2 in
+ if memb S a r then r else a::r
+ ].
-lemma item_eps: ∀S.∀i:pitem S. \sem{i} =1 \sem{i}-{[ ]}.
-#S #i #w %
- [#H whd % // normalize @(not_to_not … (not_epsilon_lp …i)) //
- |* //
+axiom unique_append_elim: ∀S:DeqSet.∀P: S → Prop.∀l1,l2.
+(∀x. memb S x l1 = true → P x) → (∀x. memb S x l2 = true → P x) →
+∀x. memb S x (unique_append S l1 l2) = true → P x.
+
+lemma unique_append_unique: ∀S,l1,l2. uniqueb S l2 = true →
+ uniqueb S (unique_append S l1 l2) = true.
+#S #l1 elim l1 normalize // #a #tl #Hind #l2 #uniquel2
+cases (true_or_false … (memb S a (unique_append S tl l2)))
+#H >H normalize [@Hind //] >H normalize @Hind //
+qed.
+
+(******************* sublist *******************)
+definition sublist ≝
+ λS,l1,l2.∀a. memb S a l1 = true → memb S a l2 = true.
+
+lemma sublist_length: ∀S,l1,l2.
+ uniqueb S l1 = true → sublist S l1 l2 → |l1| ≤ |l2|.
+#S #l1 elim l1 //
+#a #tl #Hind #l2 #unique #sub
+cut (∃l3,l4.l2=l3@(a::l4)) [@memb_exists @sub //]
+* #l3 * #l4 #eql2 >eql2 >length_append normalize
+applyS le_S_S <length_append @Hind [@(andb_true_r … unique)]
+>eql2 in sub; #sub #x #membx
+cases (memb_append … (sub x (orb_true_r2 … membx)))
+ [#membxl3 @memb_append_l1 //
+ |#membxal4 cases (orb_true_l … membxal4)
+ [#eqxa @False_ind lapply (andb_true_l … unique)
+ <(\P eqxa) >membx normalize /2/ |#membxl4 @memb_append_l2 //
+ ]
]
qed.
-
-lemma sem_fst_aux: ∀S.∀e:pre S.∀i:pitem S.∀A.
- \sem{e} =1 \sem{i} ∪ A → \sem{\fst e} =1 \sem{i} ∪ (A - {[ ]}).
-#S #e #i #A #seme
-@eqP_trans [|@sem_fst]
-@eqP_trans [||@eqP_union_r [|@eqP_sym @item_eps]]
-@eqP_trans [||@distribute_substract]
-@eqP_substract_r //
-qed.
-(* theorem 16: 1 *)
-theorem sem_bull: ∀S:DeqSet. ∀e:pitem S. \sem{•e} =1 \sem{e} ∪ \sem{|e|}.
-#S #e elim e
- [#w normalize % [/2/ | * //]
- |/2/
- |#x normalize #w % [ /2/ | * [@False_ind | //]]
- |#x normalize #w % [ /2/ | * // ]
- |#i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_dot
- @eqP_trans [|@odot_dot_aux //] >sem_cat
- @eqP_trans
- [|@eqP_union_r
- [|@eqP_trans [|@(cat_ext_l … IH1)] @distr_cat_r]]
- @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc]
- @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
- @eqP_union_l //
- |#i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_plus
- @eqP_trans [|@sem_oplus] >sem_plus >erase_plus
- @eqP_trans [|@(eqP_union_l … IH2)]
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
- @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] @eqP_union_r
- @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
- @eqP_trans [||@eqP_union_l [|@union_comm]]
- @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] /2/
- |#i #H >sem_pre_true >sem_star >erase_bull >sem_star
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@cat_ext_l [|@sem_fst_aux //]]]
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@distr_cat_r]]
- @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] @eqP_union_l >erase_star
- @eqP_sym @star_fix_eps
+lemma sublist_unique_append_l1:
+ ∀S,l1,l2. sublist S l1 (unique_append S l1 l2).
+#S #l1 elim l1 normalize [#l2 #S #abs @False_ind /2/]
+#x #tl #Hind #l2 #a
+normalize cases (true_or_false … (a==x)) #eqax >eqax
+[<(\P eqax) cases (true_or_false (memb S a (unique_append S tl l2)))
+ [#H >H normalize // | #H >H normalize >(\b (refl … a)) //]
+|cases (memb S x (unique_append S tl l2)) normalize
+ [/2/ |>eqax normalize /2/]
+]
+qed.
+
+lemma sublist_unique_append_l2:
+ ∀S,l1,l2. sublist S l2 (unique_append S l1 l2).
+#S #l1 elim l1 [normalize //] #x #tl #Hind normalize
+#l2 #a cases (memb S x (unique_append S tl l2)) normalize
+[@Hind | cases (a==x) normalize // @Hind]
+qed.
+
+lemma decidable_sublist:∀S,l1,l2.
+ (sublist S l1 l2) ∨ ¬(sublist S l1 l2).
+#S #l1 #l2 elim l1
+ [%1 #a normalize in ⊢ (%→?); #abs @False_ind /2/
+ |#a #tl * #subtl
+ [cases (true_or_false (memb S a l2)) #memba
+ [%1 whd #x #membx cases (orb_true_l … membx)
+ [#eqax >(\P eqax) // |@subtl]
+ |%2 @(not_to_not … (eqnot_to_noteq … true memba)) #H1 @H1 @memb_hd
+ ]
+ |%2 @(not_to_not … subtl) #H1 #x #H2 @H1 @memb_cons //
+ ]
]
qed.
-definition lifted_cat ≝ λS:DeqSet.λe:pre S.
- lift S (lc S eclose e).
+(********************* filtering *****************)
-notation "e1 ⊙ e2" left associative with precedence 70 for @{'odot $e1 $e2}.
-
-interpretation "lifted cat" 'odot e1 e2 = (lifted_cat ? e1 e2).
-
-lemma odot_true_b : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b.
- 〈i1,true〉 ⊙ 〈i2,b〉 = 〈i1 · (\fst (•i2)),\snd (•i2) ∨ b〉.
-#S #i1 #i2 #b normalize in ⊢ (??%?); cases (•i2) //
-qed.
-
-lemma odot_false_b : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b.
- 〈i1,false〉 ⊙ 〈i2,b〉 = 〈i1 · i2 ,b〉.
-//
-qed.
+lemma filter_true: ∀S,f,a,l.
+ memb S a (filter S f l) = true → f a = true.
+#S #f #a #l elim l [normalize #H @False_ind /2/]
+#b #tl #Hind cases (true_or_false (f b)) #H
+normalize >H normalize [2:@Hind]
+cases (true_or_false (a==b)) #eqab
+ [#_ >(\P eqab) // | >eqab normalize @Hind]
+qed.
-lemma erase_odot:∀S.∀e1,e2:pre S.
- |\fst (e1 ⊙ e2)| = |\fst e1| · (|\fst e2|).
-#S * #i1 * * #i2 #b2 // >odot_true_b //
+lemma memb_filter_memb: ∀S,f,a,l.
+ memb S a (filter S f l) = true → memb S a l = true.
+#S #f #a #l elim l [normalize //]
+#b #tl #Hind normalize (cases (f b)) normalize
+cases (a==b) normalize // @Hind
qed.
-
-lemma ostar_true: ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
- 〈i,true〉^⊛ = 〈(\fst (•i))^*, true〉.
-// qed.
-
-lemma ostar_false: ∀S.∀i:pitem S.
- 〈i,false〉^⊛ = 〈i^*, false〉.
-// qed.
-lemma erase_ostar: ∀S.∀e:pre S.
- |\fst (e^⊛)| = |\fst e|^*.
-#S * #i * // qed.
-
-lemma sem_odot_true: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1:pre S.∀i.
- \sem{e1 ⊙ 〈i,true〉} =1 \sem{e1 ▸ i} ∪ { [ ] }.
-#S #e1 #i
-cut (e1 ⊙ 〈i,true〉 = 〈\fst (e1 ▸ i), \snd(e1 ▸ i) ∨ true〉) [//]
-#H >H cases (e1 ▸ i) #i1 #b1 cases b1
- [>sem_pre_true @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc]
- @eqP_union_l /2/
- |/2/
+lemma memb_filter: ∀S,f,l,x. memb S x (filter ? f l) = true →
+memb S x l = true ∧ (f x = true).
+/3/ qed.
+
+lemma memb_filter_l: ∀S,f,x,l. (f x = true) → memb S x l = true →
+memb S x (filter ? f l) = true.
+#S #f #x #l #fx elim l normalize //
+#b #tl #Hind cases (true_or_false (x==b)) #eqxb
+ [<(\P eqxb) >(\b (refl … x)) >fx normalize >(\b (refl … x)) normalize //
+ |>eqxb cases (f b) normalize [>eqxb normalize @Hind| @Hind]
]
-qed.
+qed.
-lemma eq_odot_false: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1:pre S.∀i.
- e1 ⊙ 〈i,false〉 = e1 ▸ i.
-#S #e1 #i
-cut (e1 ⊙ 〈i,false〉 = 〈\fst (e1 ▸ i), \snd(e1 ▸ i) ∨ false〉) [//]
-cases (e1 ▸ i) #i1 #b1 cases b1 #H @H
-qed.
+(********************* exists *****************)
-lemma sem_odot:
- ∀S.∀e1,e2: pre S. \sem{e1 ⊙ e2} =1 \sem{e1}· \sem{|\fst e2|} ∪ \sem{e2}.
-#S #e1 * #i2 *
- [>sem_pre_true
- @eqP_trans [|@sem_odot_true]
- @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] @eqP_union_r @odot_dot_aux //
- |>sem_pre_false >eq_odot_false @odot_dot_aux //
- ]
-qed.
+let rec exists (A:Type[0]) (p:A → bool) (l:list A) on l : bool ≝
+match l with
+[ nil ⇒ false
+| cons h t ⇒ orb (p h) (exists A p t)
+].
-(* theorem 16: 4 *)
-theorem sem_ostar: ∀S.∀e:pre S.
- \sem{e^⊛} =1 \sem{e} · \sem{|\fst e|}^*.
-#S * #i #b cases b
- [>sem_pre_true >sem_pre_true >sem_star >erase_bull
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r[|@cat_ext_l [|@sem_fst_aux //]]]
- @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@distr_cat_r]]
- @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @distr_cat_r]
- @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] @eqP_union_l
- @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @epsilon_cat_l] @eqP_sym @star_fix_eps
- |>sem_pre_false >sem_pre_false >sem_star /2/
- ]
+lemma Exists_exists : ∀A,P,l.
+ Exists A P l →
+ ∃x. P x.
+#A #P #l elim l [ * | #hd #tl #IH * [ #H %{hd} @H | @IH ]
qed.
-
projects / helm.git / blobdiff