X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?p=helm.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=matita%2Fcomponents%2Fng_tactics%2Fdeclarative.ml;h=a136a51dd88afc306661a18aee087139dadaf99f;hp=ac521186a4db80d0c6190d9b39c4ba547406a718;hb=784f0d4d7cff3700363affe647f7b8b218726fcb;hpb=dd627e471392375ca7b6dad78a931a8682e06dbe diff --git a/matita/components/ng_tactics/declarative.ml b/matita/components/ng_tactics/declarative.ml index ac521186a..a136a51dd 100644 --- a/matita/components/ng_tactics/declarative.ml +++ b/matita/components/ng_tactics/declarative.ml @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ (* Copyright (C) 2019, HELM Team. - * + * * This file is part of HELM, an Hypertextual, Electronic * Library of Mathematics, developed at the Computer Science * Department, University of Bologna, Italy. - * + * * HELM is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 * of the License, or (at your option) any later version. - * + * * HELM is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the @@ -18,327 +18,623 @@ * along with HELM; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, * MA 02111-1307, USA. - * + * * For details, see the HELM World-Wide-Web page, * http://cs.unibo.it/helm/. - *) +*) +open Continuationals.Stack module Ast = NotationPt open NTactics open NTacStatus type just = [ `Term of NTacStatus.tactic_term | `Auto of NnAuto.auto_params ] -let mk_just = - function - `Auto (l,params) -> distribute_tac (fun status goal -> NnAuto.auto_lowtac - ~params:(l,params) status goal) - | `Term t -> apply_tac t +let mk_just status goal = + function + `Auto (l,params) -> NnAuto.auto_lowtac ~params:(l,params) status goal + | `Term t -> apply_tac t exception NotAProduct exception FirstTypeWrong exception NotEquivalentTypes +let extract_first_goal_from_status status = + let s = status#stack in + match s with + | [] -> fail (lazy "There's nothing to prove") + | (g1, _, _k, _tag1, _) :: _tl -> + let goals = filter_open g1 in + match goals with + [] -> fail (lazy "No goals under focus") + | loc::_tl -> + let goal = goal_of_loc (loc) in + goal ;; + let extract_conclusion_type status goal = - let gty = get_goalty status goal in - let ctx = ctx_of gty in - let status,gty = term_of_cic_term status gty ctx in - gty + let gty = get_goalty status goal in + let ctx = ctx_of gty in + term_of_cic_term status gty ctx ;; -let same_type_as_conclusion ty t status goal = - let gty = get_goalty status goal in - let ctx = ctx_of gty in - let status,cicterm = disambiguate status ctx ty `XTNone (*(`XTSome (mk_cic_term ctx t))*) in - let (_,_,metasenv,subst,_) = status#obj in - let status,ty = term_of_cic_term status cicterm ctx in - if NCicReduction.alpha_eq status metasenv subst ctx t ty then - true - else - false +let alpha_eq_tacterm_kerterm ty t status goal = + let gty = get_goalty status goal in + let ctx = ctx_of gty in + let status,cicterm = disambiguate status ctx ty `XTNone (*(`XTSome (mk_cic_term ctx t))*) in + let (_,_,metasenv,subst,_) = status#obj in + let status,ty = term_of_cic_term status cicterm ctx in + if NCicReduction.alpha_eq status metasenv subst ctx t ty then + true + else + false ;; let are_convertible ty1 ty2 status goal = - let gty = get_goalty status goal in - let ctx = ctx_of gty in - let status,cicterm1 = disambiguate status ctx ty1 `XTNone (*(`XTSome (mk_cic_term ctx t))*) in - let status,cicterm2 = disambiguate status ctx ty2 `XTNone (*(`XTSome (mk_cic_term ctx t))*) in - NTacStatus.are_convertible status ctx cicterm1 cicterm2 + let gty = get_goalty status goal in + let ctx = ctx_of gty in + let status,cicterm1 = disambiguate status ctx ty1 `XTNone in + let status,cicterm2 = disambiguate status ctx ty2 `XTNone in + NTacStatus.are_convertible status ctx cicterm1 cicterm2 + +let clear_volatile_params_tac status = + match status#stack with + [] -> fail (lazy "Empty stack") + | (g,t,k,tag,p)::tl -> + let rec remove_volatile = function + [] -> [] + | (k,_v as hd')::tl' -> + let re = Str.regexp "volatile_.*" in + if Str.string_match re k 0 then + remove_volatile tl' + else + hd'::(remove_volatile tl') + in + let newp = remove_volatile p in + status#set_stack ((g,t,k,tag,newp)::tl) +;; + +let add_parameter_tac key value status = + match status#stack with + [] -> status + | (g,t,k,tag,p) :: tl -> status#set_stack ((g,t,k,tag,(key,value)::p)::tl) +;; + (* LCF-like tactic that checks whether the conclusion of the sequent of the given goal is a product, checks that -the type of the conclusion's bound variable is the same as t1 and then uses an exact_tac with -\lambda id: t1. ?. If a t2 is given it checks that t1 ~_{\beta} t2 and uses and exact_tac with \lambda id: t2. ? + the type of the conclusion's bound variable is the same as t1 and then uses an exact_tac with + \lambda id: t1. ?. If a t2 is given it checks that t1 ~_{\beta} t2 and uses and exact_tac with \lambda id: t2. ? *) -let lambda_abstract_tac id t1 t2 status goal = - match extract_conclusion_type status goal with - | NCic.Prod (_,t,_) -> - if same_type_as_conclusion t1 t status goal then - match t2 with - | None -> - let (_,_,t1) = t1 in - exec (exact_tac ("",0,(Ast.Binder (`Lambda,(Ast.Ident (id,None),Some t1),Ast.Implicit - `JustOne)))) status goal - - | Some t2 -> - let status,res = are_convertible t1 t2 status goal in - if res then - let (_,_,t2) = t2 in - exec (exact_tac ("",0,(Ast.Binder (`Lambda,(Ast.Ident (id,None),Some t2),Ast.Implicit - `JustOne)))) status goal - else - raise NotEquivalentTypes - else - raise FirstTypeWrong - | _ -> raise NotAProduct - -let assume name ty eqty = - distribute_tac (fun status goal -> - try lambda_abstract_tac name ty eqty status goal - with - | NotAProduct -> fail (lazy "You can't assume without an universal quantification") - | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The assumed type is wrong") - | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The two given types are not equivalent") - ) +let lambda_abstract_tac id t1 status goal = + match extract_conclusion_type status goal with + | status,NCic.Prod (_,t,_) -> + if alpha_eq_tacterm_kerterm t1 t status goal then + let (_,_,t1) = t1 in + block_tac [exact_tac ("",0,(Ast.Binder (`Lambda,(Ast.Ident (id,None),Some t1),Ast.Implicit + `JustOne))); clear_volatile_params_tac; + add_parameter_tac "volatile_newhypo" id] status + else + raise FirstTypeWrong + | _ -> raise NotAProduct + +let assume name ty status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + try lambda_abstract_tac name ty status goal + with + | NotAProduct -> fail (lazy "You can't assume without an universal quantification") + | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The assumed type is wrong") + | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The two given types are not equivalent") ;; -let suppose t1 id t2 = - distribute_tac (fun status goal -> - try lambda_abstract_tac id t1 t2 status goal - with - | NotAProduct -> fail (lazy "You can't suppose without a logical implication") - | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The supposed proposition is different from the premise") - | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The two given propositions are not equivalent") - ) +let suppose t1 id status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + try lambda_abstract_tac id t1 status goal + with + | NotAProduct -> fail (lazy "You can't suppose without a logical implication") + | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The supposed proposition is different from the premise") + | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The two given propositions are not equivalent") ;; let assert_tac t1 t2 status goal continuation = - let t = extract_conclusion_type status goal in - if same_type_as_conclusion t1 t status goal then - match t2 with - | None -> exec continuation status goal - | Some t2 -> - let status,res = are_convertible t1 t2 status goal in - if res then - exec continuation status goal - else - raise NotEquivalentTypes + let status,t = extract_conclusion_type status goal in + if alpha_eq_tacterm_kerterm t1 t status goal then + match t2 with + | None -> continuation + | Some t2 -> + let _status,res = are_convertible t1 t2 status goal in + if res then continuation + else + raise NotEquivalentTypes + else + raise FirstTypeWrong + +let branch_dot_tac status = + match status#stack with + ([],t,k,tag,p) :: tl -> + if List.length t > 0 then + status#set_stack (([List.hd t],List.tl t,k,tag,p)::tl) else - raise FirstTypeWrong - -let we_need_to_prove t id t1 = - distribute_tac (fun status goal -> - match id with - | None -> - ( - match t1 with - | None -> (* We need to prove t *) - ( - try - assert_tac t None status goal id_tac - with - | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The given proposition is not the same as the conclusion") - ) - | Some t1 -> (* We need to prove t or equivalently t1 *) - ( - try - assert_tac t (Some t1) status goal (change_tac ~where:("",0,(None,[],Some Ast.UserInput)) ~with_what:t1) - with - | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The given proposition is not the same as the conclusion") - | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The given propositions are not equivalent") - ) - ) - | Some id -> - ( - match t1 with - | None -> (* We need to prove t (id) *) - exec (block_tac [cut_tac t; branch_tac ~force:false; shift_tac; intro_tac id; - (*merge_tac*)]) status goal - | Some t1 -> (* We need to prove t (id) or equivalently t1 *) - exec (block_tac [cut_tac t; branch_tac ~force:false; change_tac ~where:("",0,(None,[],Some Ast.UserInput)) - ~with_what:t1; shift_tac; intro_tac id; merge_tac]) status goal - ) + status + | _ -> status +;; + +let status_parameter key status = + match status#stack with + [] -> "" + | (_g,_t,_k,_tag,p)::_ -> try List.assoc key p with _ -> "" +;; + +let beta_rewriting_step t status = + let ctx = status_parameter "volatile_context" status in + if ctx <> "beta_rewrite" then + ( + let newhypo = status_parameter "volatile_newhypo" status in + if newhypo = "" then + fail (lazy "Invalid use of 'that is equivalent to'") + else + change_tac ~where:("",0,(None,[newhypo,Ast.UserInput],None)) ~with_what:t status + ) + else + change_tac ~where:("",0,(None,[],Some + Ast.UserInput)) ~with_what:t status +;; + +let done_continuation status = + let rec continuation l = + match l with + [] -> [] + | (_,t,_,tag,p)::tl -> + if tag = `BranchTag then + if List.length t > 0 then + let continue = + let ctx = + try List.assoc "context" p + with Not_found -> "" + in + ctx <> "induction" && ctx <> "cases" + in + if continue then [clear_volatile_params_tac;branch_dot_tac] else + [clear_volatile_params_tac] + else + [merge_tac] @ (continuation tl) + else + [] + in + continuation status#stack +;; + +let bydone just status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let continuation = done_continuation status in + let l = [mk_just status goal just] @ continuation in + block_tac l status +;; + +let push_goals_tac status = + match status#stack with + [] -> fail (lazy "Error pushing goals") + | (g1,t1,k1,tag1,p1) :: (g2,t2,k2,tag2,p2) :: tl -> + if List.length g2 > 0 then + status#set_stack ((g1,t1 @+ g2,k1,tag1,p1) :: ([],t2,k2,tag2,p2) :: tl) + else status (* Nothing to push *) + | _ -> status + +let we_need_to_prove t id status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + match id with + | None -> + ( + try assert_tac t None status goal (add_parameter_tac "volatile_context" "beta_rewrite" status) + with + | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The given proposition is not the same as the conclusion") + ) + | Some id -> + ( + block_tac [clear_volatile_params_tac; cut_tac t; branch_tac; shift_tac; intro_tac id; merge_tac; branch_tac; + push_goals_tac; add_parameter_tac "volatile_context" "beta_rewrite" + ] status ) ;; -let by_just_we_proved just ty id ty' = - distribute_tac (fun status goal -> - let just = mk_just just in - match id with - | None -> - (match ty' with - | None -> (* just we proved P done *) - ( - try - assert_tac ty None status goal just - with - | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The given proposition is not the same as the conclusion") - | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The given propositions are not equivalent") - ) - | Some ty' -> (* just we proved P that is equivalent to P' done *) - ( - try - assert_tac ty' (Some ty) status goal (block_tac [change_tac - ~where:("",0,(None,[],Some Ast.UserInput)) ~with_what:ty; just]) - with - | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "The second proposition is not the same as the conclusion") - | NotEquivalentTypes -> fail (lazy "The given propositions are not equivalent") - ) - ) - | Some id -> - ( - match ty' with - | None -> exec (block_tac [cut_tac ty; branch_tac; just; shift_tac; intro_tac - id; merge_tac ]) status goal - | Some ty' -> exec (block_tac [cut_tac ty; branch_tac; just; shift_tac; intro_tac - id; change_tac ~where:("",0,(None,[id,Ast.UserInput],None)) - ~with_what:ty'; merge_tac]) status goal - ) +let by_just_we_proved just ty id status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let just = mk_just status goal just in + match id with + | None -> + assert_tac ty None status goal (block_tac [clear_volatile_params_tac; add_parameter_tac + "volatile_context" "beta_rewrite"] status) + | Some id -> + ( + block_tac [cut_tac ty; branch_tac; just; shift_tac; intro_tac id; merge_tac; + clear_volatile_params_tac; add_parameter_tac "volatile_newhypo" id] status ) ;; -let thesisbecomes t1 t2 = we_need_to_prove t1 None t2 ;; +let existselim just id1 t1 t2 id2 status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let (_,_,t1) = t1 in + let (_,_,t2) = t2 in + let just = mk_just status goal just in + (block_tac [ + cut_tac ("",0,(Ast.Appl [Ast.Ident ("ex",None); t1; Ast.Binder (`Lambda,(Ast.Ident + (id1,None), Some t1),t2)])); + branch_tac ~force:false; + just; + shift_tac; + case1_tac "_"; + intros_tac ~names_ref:(ref []) [id1;id2]; + merge_tac; + clear_volatile_params_tac + ]) status +;; -let bydone just = - mk_just just +let andelim just t1 id1 t2 id2 status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let (_,_,t1) = t1 in + let (_,_,t2) = t2 in + let just = mk_just status goal just in + (block_tac [ + cut_tac ("",0,(Ast.Appl [Ast.Ident ("And",None); t1 ; t2])); + branch_tac ~force:false; + just; + shift_tac; + case1_tac "_"; + intros_tac ~names_ref:(ref []) [id1;id2]; + merge_tac; + clear_volatile_params_tac + ]) status ;; -let existselim just id1 t1 t2 id2 = - let (_,_,t1) = t1 in - let (_,_,t2) = t2 in - let just = mk_just just in - block_tac [ - cut_tac ("",0,(Ast.Appl [Ast.Ident ("ex",None); t1; Ast.Binder (`Lambda,(Ast.Ident - (id1,None), Some t1),t2)])); - branch_tac ~force:false; - just; - shift_tac; - case1_tac "_"; - intros_tac ~names_ref:(ref []) [id1;id2]; - merge_tac - ] - -let andelim just t1 id1 t2 id2 = - let (_,_,t1) = t1 in - let (_,_,t2) = t2 in - let just = mk_just just in - block_tac [ - cut_tac ("",0,(Ast.Appl [Ast.Ident ("And",None); t1 ; t2])); - branch_tac ~force:false; - just; - shift_tac; - case1_tac "_"; - intros_tac ~names_ref:(ref []) [id1;id2]; - merge_tac - ] +let type_of_tactic_term status ctx t = + let status,cicterm = disambiguate status ctx t `XTNone in + let (_,cicty) = typeof status ctx cicterm in + cicty + +let swap_first_two_goals_tac status = + let gstatus = + match status#stack with + | [] -> assert false + | (g,t,k,tag,p) :: s -> + match g with + | (loc1) :: (loc2) :: tl -> + ([loc2;loc1] @+ tl,t,k,tag,p) :: s + | _ -> assert false + in + status#set_stack gstatus + +let thesisbecomes t1 = we_need_to_prove t1 None ;; +let obtain id t1 status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let cicgty = get_goalty status goal in + let ctx = ctx_of cicgty in + let cicty = type_of_tactic_term status ctx t1 in + let _,ty = term_of_cic_term status cicty ctx in + let (_,_,t1) = t1 in + block_tac [ cut_tac ("",0,(Ast.Appl [Ast.Ident ("eq",None); Ast.NCic ty; t1; Ast.Implicit + `JustOne])); + swap_first_two_goals_tac; + branch_tac; shift_tac; shift_tac; intro_tac id; merge_tac; branch_tac; push_goals_tac; + add_parameter_tac "volatile_context" "rewrite" + ] + status +;; +let conclude t1 status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let cicgty = get_goalty status goal in + let ctx = ctx_of cicgty in + let _,gty = term_of_cic_term status cicgty ctx in + match gty with + (* The first term of this Appl should probably be "eq" *) + NCic.Appl [_;_;plhs;_] -> + if alpha_eq_tacterm_kerterm t1 plhs status goal then + add_parameter_tac "volatile_context" "rewrite" status + else + fail (lazy "The given conclusion is different from the left-hand side of the current conclusion") + | _ -> fail (lazy "Your conclusion needs to be an equality") +;; -let rewritingstep lhs rhs just last_step = fail (lazy "Not implemented"); - (* - let aux ((proof,goal) as status) = - let (curi,metasenv,_subst,proofbo,proofty, attrs) = proof in - let _,context,gty = CicUtil.lookup_meta goal metasenv in - let eq,trans = - match LibraryObjects.eq_URI () with - None -> raise (ProofEngineTypes.Fail (lazy "You need to register the default equality first. Please use the \"default\" command")) - | Some uri -> - Cic.MutInd (uri,0,[]), Cic.Const (LibraryObjects.trans_eq_URI ~eq:uri,[]) +let rewritingstep rhs just last_step status = + let ctx = status_parameter "volatile_context" status in + if ctx = "rewrite" then + ( + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let cicgty = get_goalty status goal in + let ctx = ctx_of cicgty in + let _,gty = term_of_cic_term status cicgty ctx in + let cicty = type_of_tactic_term status ctx rhs in + let _,ty = term_of_cic_term status cicty ctx in + let just' = (* Extraction of the ""justification"" from the ad hoc justification *) + match just with + `Auto (univ, params) -> + let params = + if not (List.mem_assoc "timeout" params) then + ("timeout","3")::params + else params + in + let params' = + if not (List.mem_assoc "paramodulation" params) then + ("paramodulation","1")::params + else params + in + if params = params' then NnAuto.auto_lowtac ~params:(univ, params) status goal + else + first_tac [NnAuto.auto_lowtac ~params:(univ, params) status goal; NnAuto.auto_lowtac + ~params:(univ, params') status goal] + | `Term just -> apply_tac just + | `SolveWith term -> NnAuto.demod_tac ~params:(Some [term], ["all","1";"steps","1"; "use_ctx","false"]) + | `Proof -> id_tac + in + let plhs,prhs,prepare = + match gty with (* Extracting the lhs and rhs of the previous equality *) + NCic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs,(fun continuation -> continuation status) + | _ -> fail (lazy "You are not building an equaility chain") + in + let continuation = + if last_step then + let todo = [just'] @ (done_continuation status) in + block_tac todo + else + let (_,_,rhs) = rhs in + block_tac [apply_tac ("",0,Ast.Appl [Ast.Ident ("trans_eq",None); Ast.NCic ty; Ast.NCic plhs; + rhs; Ast.NCic prhs]); branch_tac; just'; merge_tac] + in + prepare continuation + ) + else + fail (lazy "You are not building an equality chain") +;; + +let rec pp_metasenv_names (metasenv:NCic.metasenv) = + match metasenv with + [] -> "" + | hd :: tl -> + let n,conj = hd in + let meta_attrs,_,_ = conj in + let rec find_name_aux meta_attrs = match meta_attrs with + [] -> "Anonymous" + | hd :: tl -> match hd with + `Name n -> n + | _ -> find_name_aux tl + in + let name = find_name_aux meta_attrs + in + "[Goal: " ^ (string_of_int n) ^ ", Name: " ^ name ^ "]; " ^ (pp_metasenv_names tl) +;; + +let print_goals_names_tac s (status:#NTacStatus.tac_status) = + let (_,_,metasenv,_,_) = status#obj in + prerr_endline (s ^" -> Metasenv: " ^ (pp_metasenv_names metasenv)); status + +(* Useful as it does not change the order in the list *) +let rec list_change_assoc k v = function + [] -> [] + | (k',_v' as hd) :: tl -> if k' = k then (k',v) :: tl else hd :: (list_change_assoc k v tl) +;; + +let add_names_to_goals_tac (cl:NCic.constructor list ref) (status:#NTacStatus.tac_status) = + let add_name_to_goal name goal metasenv = + let (mattrs,ctx,t) = try List.assoc goal metasenv with _ -> assert false in + let mattrs = (`Name name) :: (List.filter (function `Name _ -> false | _ -> true) mattrs) in + let newconj = (mattrs,ctx,t) in + list_change_assoc goal newconj metasenv in - let ty,_ = - CicTypeChecker.type_of_aux' metasenv context rhs CicUniv.oblivion_ugraph in - let just' = - match just with - `Auto (univ, params) -> - let params = - if not (List.exists (fun (k,_) -> k = "timeout") params) then - ("timeout","3")::params - else params - in - let params' = - if not (List.exists (fun (k,_) -> k = "paramodulation") params) then - ("paramodulation","1")::params - else params - in - if params = params' then - Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:(univ, params) ~automation_cache - else - Tacticals.first - [Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:(univ, params) ~automation_cache ; - Tactics.auto ~dbd ~params:(univ, params') ~automation_cache] - | `Term just -> Tactics.apply just - | `SolveWith term -> - Tactics.demodulate ~automation_cache ~dbd - ~params:(Some [term], - ["all","1";"steps","1"; "use_context","false"]) - | `Proof -> - Tacticals.id_tac + let new_goals = + (* It's important that this tactic is called before branching and right after the creation of + * the new goals, when they are still under focus *) + match status#stack with + [] -> fail (lazy "Can not add names to an empty stack") + | (g,_,_,_,_) :: _tl -> + let rec sublist n = function + [] -> [] + | hd :: tl -> if n = 0 then [] else hd :: (sublist (n-1) tl) + in + List.map (fun _,sw -> goal_of_switch sw) (sublist (List.length !cl) g) + in + let rec add_names_to_goals g cl metasenv = + match g,cl with + [],[] -> metasenv + | hd::tl, (_,consname,_)::tl' -> + add_names_to_goals tl tl' (add_name_to_goal consname hd metasenv) + | _,_ -> fail (lazy "There are less goals than constructors") in - let plhs,prhs,prepare = - match lhs with - None -> - let plhs,prhs = - match gty with - Cic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs - | _ -> assert false + let (olduri,oldint,metasenv,oldsubst,oldkind) = status#obj in + let newmetasenv = add_names_to_goals new_goals !cl metasenv + in status#set_obj(olduri,oldint,newmetasenv,oldsubst,oldkind) +;; +(* + let (olduri,oldint,metasenv,oldsubst,oldkind) = status#obj in + let remove_name_from_metaattrs = + List.filter (function `Name _ -> false | _ -> true) in + let rec add_names_to_metasenv cl metasenv = + match cl,metasenv with + [],_ -> metasenv + | hd :: tl, mhd :: mtl -> + let _,consname,_ = hd in + let gnum,conj = mhd in + let mattrs,ctx,t = conj in + let mattrs = [`Name consname] @ (remove_name_from_metaattrs mattrs) in - plhs,prhs, - (fun continuation -> - ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic continuation status) - | Some (None,lhs) -> - let plhs,prhs = - match gty with - Cic.Appl [_;_;plhs;prhs] -> plhs,prhs - | _ -> assert false + let newconj = mattrs,ctx,t in + let newmeta = gnum,newconj in + newmeta :: (add_names_to_metasenv tl mtl) + | _,[] -> assert false + in + let newmetasenv = add_names_to_metasenv !cl metasenv in + status#set_obj (olduri,oldint,newmetasenv,oldsubst,oldkind) +*) + +let unfocus_branch_tac status = + match status#stack with + [] -> status + | (g,t,k,tag,p) :: tl -> status#set_stack (([],g @+ t,k,tag,p)::tl) +;; + +let we_proceed_by_induction_on t1 t2 status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let txt,len,t1 = t1 in + let t1 = txt, len, Ast.Appl [t1; Ast.Implicit `Vector] in + let indtyinfo = ref None in + let sort = ref (NCic.Rel 1) in + let cl = ref [] in (* this is a ref on purpose, as the block of code after sort_of_goal_tac in + block_tac acts as a block of asynchronous code, in which cl gets modified with the info retrieved + with analize_indty_tac, and later used to label each new goal with a costructor name. Using a + plain list this doesn't seem to work, as add_names_to_goals_tac would immediately act on an empty + list, instead of acting on the list of constructors *) + try + assert_tac t2 None status goal (block_tac [ + analyze_indty_tac ~what:t1 indtyinfo; + sort_of_goal_tac sort; + (fun status -> + let ity = HExtlib.unopt !indtyinfo in + let NReference.Ref (uri, _) = ref_of_indtyinfo ity in + let name = + NUri.name_of_uri uri ^ "_" ^ + snd (NCicElim.ast_of_sort + (match !sort with NCic.Sort x -> x | _ -> assert false)) + in + let eliminator = + let l = [Ast.Ident (name,None)] in + (* Generating an implicit for each argument of the inductive type, plus one the + * predicate, plus an implicit for each constructor of the inductive type *) + let l = l @ HExtlib.mk_list (Ast.Implicit `JustOne) (ity.leftno+1+ity.consno) in + let _,_,t1 = t1 in + let l = l @ [t1] in + Ast.Appl l + in + cl := ity.cl; + exact_tac ("",0,eliminator) status); + add_names_to_goals_tac cl; + branch_tac; + push_goals_tac; + unfocus_branch_tac; + add_parameter_tac "context" "induction" + ] status) + with + | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "What you want to prove is different from the conclusion") +;; + +let we_proceed_by_cases_on ((txt,len,ast1) as t1) t2 status = + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let npt1 = txt, len, Ast.Appl [ast1; Ast.Implicit `Vector] in + let indtyinfo = ref None in + let cl = ref [] in + try + assert_tac t2 None status goal (block_tac [ + analyze_indty_tac ~what:npt1 indtyinfo; + cases_tac ~what:t1 ~where:("",0,(None,[],Some + Ast.UserInput)); + ( + fun status -> + let ity = HExtlib.unopt !indtyinfo in + cl := ity.cl; add_names_to_goals_tac cl status + ); + branch_tac; push_goals_tac; + unfocus_branch_tac; + add_parameter_tac "context" "cases" + ] status) + with + | FirstTypeWrong -> fail (lazy "What you want to prove is different from the conclusion") +;; + +let byinduction t1 id status = + let ctx = status_parameter "context" status in + if ctx <> "induction" then fail (lazy "You can't use this tactic outside of an induction context") + else suppose t1 id status +;; + +let name_of_conj conj = + let mattrs,_,_ = conj in + let rec search_name mattrs = + match mattrs with + [] -> "Anonymous" + | hd::tl -> + match hd with + `Name n -> n + | _ -> search_name tl + in + search_name mattrs + +let rec loc_of_goal goal l = + match l with + [] -> fail (lazy "Reached the end") + | hd :: tl -> + let _,sw = hd in + let g = goal_of_switch sw in + if g = goal then hd + else loc_of_goal goal tl +;; + +let has_focused_goal status = + match status#stack with + [] -> false + | ([],_,_,_,_) :: _tl -> false + | _ -> true +;; + +let focus_on_case_tac case status = + let (_,_,metasenv,_,_) = status#obj in + let rec goal_of_case case metasenv = + match metasenv with + [] -> fail (lazy "The given case does not exist") + | (goal,conj) :: tl -> + if name_of_conj conj = case then goal + else goal_of_case case tl + in + let goal_to_focus = goal_of_case case metasenv in + let gstatus = + match status#stack with + [] -> fail (lazy "There is nothing to prove") + | (g,t,k,tag,p) :: s -> + let loc = + try + loc_of_goal goal_to_focus t + with _ -> fail (lazy "The given case is not part of the current induction/cases analysis + context") + in + let curloc = if has_focused_goal status then + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + [loc_of_goal goal g] + else [] + in + (((g @- curloc) @+ [loc]),(curloc @+ (t @- [loc])),k,tag,p) :: s + in + status#set_stack gstatus +;; + +let case id l status = + let ctx = status_parameter "context" status in + if ctx <> "induction" && ctx <> "cases" then fail (lazy "You can't use case outside of an + induction/cases analysis context") +else + ( + if has_focused_goal status then fail (lazy "Finish the current case before switching") + else + ( +(* + let goal = extract_first_goal_from_status status in + let (_,_,metasenv,_,_) = status#obj in + let conj = NCicUtils.lookup_meta goal metasenv in + let name = name_of_conj conj in +*) + let continuation = + let rec aux l = + match l with + [] -> [id_tac] + | (id,ty)::tl -> + (try_tac (assume id ("",0,ty))) :: (aux tl) + in + aux l in - (*CSC: manca check plhs convertibile con lhs *) - plhs,prhs, - (fun continuation -> - ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic continuation status) - | Some (Some name,lhs) -> - let newmeta = CicMkImplicit.new_meta metasenv [] in - let irl = - CicMkImplicit.identity_relocation_list_for_metavariable context in - let plhs = lhs in - let prhs = Cic.Meta(newmeta,irl) in - plhs,prhs, - (fun continuation -> - let metasenv = (newmeta, context, ty)::metasenv in - let mk_fresh_name_callback = - fun metasenv context _ ~typ -> - FreshNamesGenerator.mk_fresh_name ~subst:[] metasenv context - (Cic.Name name) ~typ - in - let proof = curi,metasenv,_subst,proofbo,proofty, attrs in - let proof,goals = - ProofEngineTypes.apply_tactic - (Tacticals.thens - ~start:(Tactics.cut ~mk_fresh_name_callback - (Cic.Appl [eq ; ty ; lhs ; prhs])) - ~continuations:[Tacticals.id_tac ; continuation]) (proof,goal) - in - let goals = - match just,goals with - `Proof, [g1;g2;g3] -> [g2;g3;newmeta;g1] - | _, [g1;g2] -> [g2;newmeta;g1] - | _, l -> - prerr_endline (String.concat "," (List.map string_of_int l)); - prerr_endline (CicMetaSubst.ppmetasenv [] metasenv); - assert false - in - proof,goals) - in - let continuation = - if last_step then - (*CSC:manca controllo sul fatto che rhs sia convertibile con prhs*) - just' - else - Tacticals.thens - ~start:(Tactics.apply ~term:(Cic.Appl [trans;ty;plhs;rhs;prhs])) - ~continuations:[just' ; Tacticals.id_tac] - in - prepare continuation - in - ProofEngineTypes.mk_tactic aux +(* if name = id then block_tac continuation status *) +(* else *) + block_tac ([focus_on_case_tac id] @ continuation) status + ) + ) ;; - *) + +let print_stack status = prerr_endline ("PRINT STACK: " ^ (pp status#stack)); id_tac status ;; + +(* vim: ts=2: sw=0: et: + * *)