X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?p=helm.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=matita%2Fmatita%2Fcontribs%2Flambdadelta%2Fbasic_2%2Frelocation%2Flreq.ma;h=1ec062b82f3d048edea7b52cddde230137ae75fb;hp=cc3e75b0a5107964bdd5b503c9e8904aca6fa0d4;hb=268e7f336d036f77ffc9663358e9afda92b97730;hpb=1604f2ee65c57eefb7c6b3122eab2a9f32e0552d diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/relocation/lreq.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/relocation/lreq.ma index cc3e75b0a..1ec062b82 100644 --- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/relocation/lreq.ma +++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/basic_2/relocation/lreq.ma @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ (* *) (**************************************************************************) -include "basic_2/notation/relations/lazyeqsn_3.ma". +include "basic_2/notation/relations/doteqsn_3.ma". include "basic_2/syntax/ceq_ext.ma". include "basic_2/relocation/lexs.ma". @@ -23,18 +23,18 @@ definition lreq: relation3 rtmap lenv lenv ≝ lexs ceq_ext cfull. interpretation "ranged equivalence (local environment)" - 'LazyEqSn f L1 L2 = (lreq f L1 L2). + 'DotEqSn f L1 L2 = (lreq f L1 L2). (* Basic properties *********************************************************) -lemma lreq_eq_repl_back: ∀L1,L2. eq_repl_back … (λf. L1 ≡[f] L2). +lemma lreq_eq_repl_back: ∀L1,L2. eq_repl_back … (λf. L1 ≐[f] L2). /2 width=3 by lexs_eq_repl_back/ qed-. -lemma lreq_eq_repl_fwd: ∀L1,L2. eq_repl_fwd … (λf. L1 ≡[f] L2). +lemma lreq_eq_repl_fwd: ∀L1,L2. eq_repl_fwd … (λf. L1 ≐[f] L2). /2 width=3 by lexs_eq_repl_fwd/ qed-. -lemma sle_lreq_trans: ∀f2,L1,L2. L1 ≡[f2] L2 → - ∀f1. f1 ⊆ f2 → L1 ≡[f1] L2. +lemma sle_lreq_trans: ∀f2,L1,L2. L1 ≐[f2] L2 → + ∀f1. f1 ⊆ f2 → L1 ≐[f1] L2. /2 width=3 by sle_lexs_trans/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_refl *) @@ -48,54 +48,54 @@ lemma lreq_sym: ∀f. symmetric … (lreq f). (* Basic inversion lemmas ***************************************************) (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_atom1 *) -lemma lreq_inv_atom1: ∀f,Y. ⋆ ≡[f] Y → Y = ⋆. +lemma lreq_inv_atom1: ∀f,Y. ⋆ ≐[f] Y → Y = ⋆. /2 width=4 by lexs_inv_atom1/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_pair1 *) -lemma lreq_inv_next1: ∀g,J,K1,Y. K1.ⓘ{J} ≡[⫯g] Y → - ∃∃K2. K1 ≡[g] K2 & Y = K2.ⓘ{J}. +lemma lreq_inv_next1: ∀g,J,K1,Y. K1.ⓘ{J} ≐[⫯g] Y → + ∃∃K2. K1 ≐[g] K2 & Y = K2.ⓘ{J}. #g #J #K1 #Y #H elim (lexs_inv_next1 … H) -H #Z #K2 #HK12 #H1 #H2 destruct <(ceq_ext_inv_eq … H1) -Z /2 width=3 by ex2_intro/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_zero1 lreq_inv_succ1 *) -lemma lreq_inv_push1: ∀g,J1,K1,Y. K1.ⓘ{J1} ≡[↑g] Y → - ∃∃J2,K2. K1 ≡[g] K2 & Y = K2.ⓘ{J2}. +lemma lreq_inv_push1: ∀g,J1,K1,Y. K1.ⓘ{J1} ≐[↑g] Y → + ∃∃J2,K2. K1 ≐[g] K2 & Y = K2.ⓘ{J2}. #g #J1 #K1 #Y #H elim (lexs_inv_push1 … H) -H /2 width=4 by ex2_2_intro/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_atom2 *) -lemma lreq_inv_atom2: ∀f,X. X ≡[f] ⋆ → X = ⋆. +lemma lreq_inv_atom2: ∀f,X. X ≐[f] ⋆ → X = ⋆. /2 width=4 by lexs_inv_atom2/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_pair2 *) -lemma lreq_inv_next2: ∀g,J,X,K2. X ≡[⫯g] K2.ⓘ{J} → - ∃∃K1. K1 ≡[g] K2 & X = K1.ⓘ{J}. +lemma lreq_inv_next2: ∀g,J,X,K2. X ≐[⫯g] K2.ⓘ{J} → + ∃∃K1. K1 ≐[g] K2 & X = K1.ⓘ{J}. #g #J #X #K2 #H elim (lexs_inv_next2 … H) -H #Z #K1 #HK12 #H1 #H2 destruct <(ceq_ext_inv_eq … H1) -J /2 width=3 by ex2_intro/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_zero2 lreq_inv_succ2 *) -lemma lreq_inv_push2: ∀g,J2,X,K2. X ≡[↑g] K2.ⓘ{J2} → - ∃∃J1,K1. K1 ≡[g] K2 & X = K1.ⓘ{J1}. +lemma lreq_inv_push2: ∀g,J2,X,K2. X ≐[↑g] K2.ⓘ{J2} → + ∃∃J1,K1. K1 ≐[g] K2 & X = K1.ⓘ{J1}. #g #J2 #X #K2 #H elim (lexs_inv_push2 … H) -H /2 width=4 by ex2_2_intro/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_pair *) -lemma lreq_inv_next: ∀f,I1,I2,L1,L2. L1.ⓘ{I1} ≡[⫯f] L2.ⓘ{I2} → - L1 ≡[f] L2 ∧ I1 = I2. +lemma lreq_inv_next: ∀f,I1,I2,L1,L2. L1.ⓘ{I1} ≐[⫯f] L2.ⓘ{I2} → + L1 ≐[f] L2 ∧ I1 = I2. #f #I1 #I2 #L1 #L2 #H elim (lexs_inv_next … H) -H /3 width=3 by ceq_ext_inv_eq, conj/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: includes: lreq_inv_succ *) -lemma lreq_inv_push: ∀f,I1,I2,L1,L2. L1.ⓘ{I1} ≡[↑f] L2.ⓘ{I2} → L1 ≡[f] L2. +lemma lreq_inv_push: ∀f,I1,I2,L1,L2. L1.ⓘ{I1} ≐[↑f] L2.ⓘ{I2} → L1 ≐[f] L2. #f #I1 #I2 #L1 #L2 #H elim (lexs_inv_push … H) -H /2 width=1 by conj/ qed-. -lemma lreq_inv_tl: ∀f,I,L1,L2. L1 ≡[⫱f] L2 → L1.ⓘ{I} ≡[f] L2.ⓘ{I}. +lemma lreq_inv_tl: ∀f,I,L1,L2. L1 ≐[⫱f] L2 → L1.ⓘ{I} ≐[f] L2.ⓘ{I}. /2 width=1 by lexs_inv_tl/ qed-. (* Basic_2A1: removed theorems 5: