X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?p=helm.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=matita%2Fmatita%2Fcontribs%2Flambdadelta%2Fstatic_2%2Fstatic%2Freq.ma;h=b53ef17559be823ba437c3a92daf35dad4cd9c8c;hp=fcd79b33a68ddf9c8068ef631fe95d0da61993e4;hb=647504aa72b84eb49be8177b88a9254174e84d4b;hpb=b2cdc4abd9ac87e39bc51b0d9c38daea179adbd5 diff --git a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/static_2/static/req.ma b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/static_2/static/req.ma index fcd79b33a..b53ef1755 100644 --- a/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/static_2/static/req.ma +++ b/matita/matita/contribs/lambdadelta/static_2/static/req.ma @@ -19,65 +19,73 @@ include "static_2/static/rex.ma". (* Basic_2A1: was: lleq *) definition req: relation3 term lenv lenv ≝ - rex ceq. + rex ceq. interpretation - "syntactic equivalence on referred entries (local environment)" - 'IdEqSn T L1 L2 = (req T L1 L2). + "syntactic equivalence on referred entries (local environment)" + 'IdEqSn T L1 L2 = (req T L1 L2). -(* Note: "req_transitive R" is equivalent to "rex_transitive ceq R R" *) +(* Note: "R_transitive_req R" is equivalent to "R_transitive_rex ceq R R" *) (* Basic_2A1: uses: lleq_transitive *) -definition req_transitive: predicate (relation3 lenv term term) ≝ +definition R_transitive_req: predicate (relation3 lenv term term) ≝ λR. ∀L2,T1,T2. R L2 T1 T2 → ∀L1. L1 ≡[T1] L2 → R L1 T1 T2. (* Basic inversion lemmas ***************************************************) -lemma req_inv_bind: ∀p,I,L1,L2,V,T. L1 ≡[ⓑ[p,I]V.T] L2 → - ∧∧ L1 ≡[V] L2 & L1.ⓑ[I]V ≡[T] L2.ⓑ[I]V. +lemma req_inv_bind: + ∀p,I,L1,L2,V,T. L1 ≡[ⓑ[p,I]V.T] L2 → + ∧∧ L1 ≡[V] L2 & L1.ⓑ[I]V ≡[T] L2.ⓑ[I]V. /2 width=2 by rex_inv_bind/ qed-. -lemma req_inv_flat: ∀I,L1,L2,V,T. L1 ≡[ⓕ[I]V.T] L2 → - ∧∧ L1 ≡[V] L2 & L1 ≡[T] L2. +lemma req_inv_flat: + ∀I,L1,L2,V,T. L1 ≡[ⓕ[I]V.T] L2 → + ∧∧ L1 ≡[V] L2 & L1 ≡[T] L2. /2 width=2 by rex_inv_flat/ qed-. (* Advanced inversion lemmas ************************************************) -lemma req_inv_zero_pair_sn: ∀I,L2,K1,V. K1.ⓑ[I]V ≡[#0] L2 → - ∃∃K2. K1 ≡[V] K2 & L2 = K2.ⓑ[I]V. +lemma req_inv_zero_pair_sn: + ∀I,L2,K1,V. K1.ⓑ[I]V ≡[#0] L2 → + ∃∃K2. K1 ≡[V] K2 & L2 = K2.ⓑ[I]V. #I #L2 #K1 #V #H elim (rex_inv_zero_pair_sn … H) -H #K2 #X #HK12 #HX #H destruct /2 width=3 by ex2_intro/ qed-. -lemma req_inv_zero_pair_dx: ∀I,L1,K2,V. L1 ≡[#0] K2.ⓑ[I]V → - ∃∃K1. K1 ≡[V] K2 & L1 = K1.ⓑ[I]V. +lemma req_inv_zero_pair_dx: + ∀I,L1,K2,V. L1 ≡[#0] K2.ⓑ[I]V → + ∃∃K1. K1 ≡[V] K2 & L1 = K1.ⓑ[I]V. #I #L1 #K2 #V #H elim (rex_inv_zero_pair_dx … H) -H #K1 #X #HK12 #HX #H destruct /2 width=3 by ex2_intro/ qed-. -lemma req_inv_lref_bind_sn: ∀I1,K1,L2,i. K1.ⓘ[I1] ≡[#↑i] L2 → - ∃∃I2,K2. K1 ≡[#i] K2 & L2 = K2.ⓘ[I2]. +lemma req_inv_lref_bind_sn: + ∀I1,K1,L2,i. K1.ⓘ[I1] ≡[#↑i] L2 → + ∃∃I2,K2. K1 ≡[#i] K2 & L2 = K2.ⓘ[I2]. /2 width=2 by rex_inv_lref_bind_sn/ qed-. -lemma req_inv_lref_bind_dx: ∀I2,K2,L1,i. L1 ≡[#↑i] K2.ⓘ[I2] → - ∃∃I1,K1. K1 ≡[#i] K2 & L1 = K1.ⓘ[I1]. +lemma req_inv_lref_bind_dx: + ∀I2,K2,L1,i. L1 ≡[#↑i] K2.ⓘ[I2] → + ∃∃I1,K1. K1 ≡[#i] K2 & L1 = K1.ⓘ[I1]. /2 width=2 by rex_inv_lref_bind_dx/ qed-. (* Basic forward lemmas *****************************************************) (* Basic_2A1: was: llpx_sn_lrefl *) (* Basic_2A1: this should have been lleq_fwd_llpx_sn *) -lemma req_fwd_rex: ∀R. c_reflexive … R → - ∀L1,L2,T. L1 ≡[T] L2 → L1 ⪤[R,T] L2. +lemma req_fwd_rex (R): + c_reflexive … R → + ∀L1,L2,T. L1 ≡[T] L2 → L1 ⪤[R,T] L2. #R #HR #L1 #L2 #T * #f #Hf #HL12 /4 width=7 by sex_co, cext2_co, ex2_intro/ qed-. (* Basic_properties *********************************************************) -lemma frees_req_conf: ∀f,L1,T. L1 ⊢ 𝐅+❪T❫ ≘ f → - ∀L2. L1 ≡[T] L2 → L2 ⊢ 𝐅+❪T❫ ≘ f. +lemma frees_req_conf: + ∀f,L1,T. L1 ⊢ 𝐅+❪T❫ ≘ f → + ∀L2. L1 ≡[T] L2 → L2 ⊢ 𝐅+❪T❫ ≘ f. #f #L1 #T #H elim H -f -L1 -T [ /2 width=3 by frees_sort/ | #f #i #Hf #L2 #H2