From: matitaweb Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:45:17 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Chapter 5 = re.ma ; chapter 6 = moves.ma X-Git-Tag: make_still_working~2012 X-Git-Url: http://matita.cs.unibo.it/gitweb/?p=helm.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=05bcc10ec41117f33d2eb6a120df4024ae14b185 Chapter 5 = re.ma ; chapter 6 = moves.ma --- diff --git a/weblib/tutorial/chapter5.ma b/weblib/tutorial/chapter5.ma new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3f58c2c48 --- /dev/null +++ b/weblib/tutorial/chapter5.ma @@ -0,0 +1,437 @@ +(**************************************************************************) +(* ___ *) +(* ||M|| *) +(* ||A|| A project by Andrea Asperti *) +(* ||T|| *) +(* ||I|| Developers: *) +(* ||T|| The HELM team. *) +(* ||A|| http://helm.cs.unibo.it *) +(* \ / *) +(* \ / This file is distributed under the terms of the *) +(* v GNU General Public License Version 2 *) +(* *) +(**************************************************************************) + +include "re/lang.ma". + +inductive re (S: DeqSet) : Type[0] ≝ + z: re S + | e: re S + | s: S → re S + | c: re S → re S → re S + | o: re S → re S → re S + | k: re S → re S. + +interpretation "re epsilon" 'epsilon = (e ?). +interpretation "re or" 'plus a b = (o ? a b). +interpretation "re cat" 'middot a b = (c ? a b). +interpretation "re star" 'star a = (k ? a). + +notation < "a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}. +notation > "` term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}. +interpretation "atom" 'ps a = (s ? a). + +notation "`∅" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'empty }. +interpretation "empty" 'empty = (z ?). + +let rec in_l (S : DeqSet) (r : re S) on r : word S → Prop ≝ +match r with +[ z ⇒ ∅ +| e ⇒ {ϵ} +| s x ⇒ {[x]} +| c r1 r2 ⇒ (in_l ? r1) · (in_l ? r2) +| o r1 r2 ⇒ (in_l ? r1) ∪ (in_l ? r2) +| k r1 ⇒ (in_l ? r1) ^*]. + +notation "\sem{term 19 E}" non associative with precedence 75 for @{'in_l $E}. +interpretation "in_l" 'in_l E = (in_l ? E). +interpretation "in_l mem" 'mem w l = (in_l ? l w). + +lemma rsem_star : ∀S.∀r: re S. \sem{r^*} = \sem{r}^*. +// qed. + + +(* pointed items *) +inductive pitem (S: DeqSet) : Type[0] ≝ + pz: pitem S + | pe: pitem S + | ps: S → pitem S + | pp: S → pitem S + | pc: pitem S → pitem S → pitem S + | po: pitem S → pitem S → pitem S + | pk: pitem S → pitem S. + +definition pre ≝ λS.pitem S × bool. + +interpretation "pitem star" 'star a = (pk ? a). +interpretation "pitem or" 'plus a b = (po ? a b). +interpretation "pitem cat" 'middot a b = (pc ? a b). +notation < ".a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}. +notation > "`. term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pp $a}. +interpretation "pitem pp" 'pp a = (pp ? a). +interpretation "pitem ps" 'ps a = (ps ? a). +interpretation "pitem epsilon" 'epsilon = (pe ?). +interpretation "pitem empty" 'empty = (pz ?). + +let rec forget (S: DeqSet) (l : pitem S) on l: re S ≝ + match l with + [ pz ⇒ `∅ + | pe ⇒ ϵ + | ps x ⇒ `x + | pp x ⇒ `x + | pc E1 E2 ⇒ (forget ? E1) · (forget ? E2) + | po E1 E2 ⇒ (forget ? E1) + (forget ? E2) + | pk E ⇒ (forget ? E)^* ]. + +(* notation < "|term 19 e|" non associative with precedence 70 for @{'forget $e}.*) +interpretation "forget" 'norm a = (forget ? a). + +let rec in_pl (S : DeqSet) (r : pitem S) on r : word S → Prop ≝ +match r with +[ pz ⇒ ∅ +| pe ⇒ ∅ +| ps _ ⇒ ∅ +| pp x ⇒ { [x] } +| pc r1 r2 ⇒ (in_pl ? r1) · \sem{forget ? r2} ∪ (in_pl ? r2) +| po r1 r2 ⇒ (in_pl ? r1) ∪ (in_pl ? r2) +| pk r1 ⇒ (in_pl ? r1) · \sem{forget ? r1}^* ]. + +interpretation "in_pl" 'in_l E = (in_pl ? E). +interpretation "in_pl mem" 'mem w l = (in_pl ? l w). + +definition in_prl ≝ λS : DeqSet.λp:pre S. + if (\snd p) then \sem{\fst p} ∪ {ϵ} else \sem{\fst p}. + +interpretation "in_prl mem" 'mem w l = (in_prl ? l w). +interpretation "in_prl" 'in_l E = (in_prl ? E). + +lemma sem_pre_true : ∀S.∀i:pitem S. + \sem{〈i,true〉} = \sem{i} ∪ {ϵ}. +// qed. + +lemma sem_pre_false : ∀S.∀i:pitem S. + \sem{〈i,false〉} = \sem{i}. +// qed. + +lemma sem_cat: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + \sem{i1 · i2} = \sem{i1} · \sem{|i2|} ∪ \sem{i2}. +// qed. + +lemma sem_cat_w: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀w. + \sem{i1 · i2} w = ((\sem{i1} · \sem{|i2|}) w ∨ \sem{i2} w). +// qed. + +lemma sem_plus: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + \sem{i1 + i2} = \sem{i1} ∪ \sem{i2}. +// qed. + +lemma sem_plus_w: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀w. + \sem{i1 + i2} w = (\sem{i1} w ∨ \sem{i2} w). +// qed. + +lemma sem_star : ∀S.∀i:pitem S. + \sem{i^*} = \sem{i} · \sem{|i|}^*. +// qed. + +lemma sem_star_w : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.∀w. + \sem{i^*} w = (∃w1,w2.w1 @ w2 = w ∧ \sem{i} w1 ∧ \sem{|i|}^* w2). +// qed. + +lemma append_eq_nil : ∀S.∀w1,w2:word S. w1 @ w2 = ϵ → w1 = ϵ. +#S #w1 #w2 cases w1 // #a #tl normalize #H destruct qed. + +lemma not_epsilon_lp : ∀S:DeqSet.∀e:pitem S. ¬ (ϵ ∈ e). +#S #e elim e normalize /2/ + [#r1 #r2 * #n1 #n2 % * /2/ * #w1 * #w2 * * #H + >(append_eq_nil …H…) /2/ + |#r1 #r2 #n1 #n2 % * /2/ + |#r #n % * #w1 * #w2 * * #H >(append_eq_nil …H…) /2/ + ] +qed. + +(* lemma 12 *) +lemma epsilon_to_true : ∀S.∀e:pre S. ϵ ∈ e → \snd e = true. +#S * #i #b cases b // normalize #H @False_ind /2/ +qed. + +lemma true_to_epsilon : ∀S.∀e:pre S. \snd e = true → ϵ ∈ e. +#S * #i #b #btrue normalize in btrue; >btrue %2 // +qed. + +definition lo ≝ λS:DeqSet.λa,b:pre S.〈\fst a + \fst b,\snd a ∨ \snd b〉. +notation "a ⊕ b" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'oplus $a $b}. +interpretation "oplus" 'oplus a b = (lo ? a b). + +lemma lo_def: ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b1,b2. 〈i1,b1〉⊕〈i2,b2〉=〈i1+i2,b1∨b2〉. +// qed. + +definition pre_concat_r ≝ λS:DeqSet.λi:pitem S.λe:pre S. + match e with [ mk_Prod i1 b ⇒ 〈i · i1, b〉]. + +notation "i ◂ e" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'ltrif $i $e}. +interpretation "pre_concat_r" 'ltrif i e = (pre_concat_r ? i e). + +lemma eq_to_ex_eq: ∀S.∀A,B:word S → Prop. + A = B → A =1 B. +#S #A #B #H >H /2/ qed. + +lemma sem_pre_concat_r : ∀S,i.∀e:pre S. + \sem{i ◂ e} =1 \sem{i} · \sem{|\fst e|} ∪ \sem{e}. +#S #i * #i1 #b1 cases b1 [2: @eq_to_ex_eq //] +>sem_pre_true >sem_cat >sem_pre_true /2/ +qed. + +definition lc ≝ λS:DeqSet.λbcast:∀S:DeqSet.pitem S → pre S.λe1:pre S.λi2:pitem S. + match e1 with + [ mk_Prod i1 b1 ⇒ match b1 with + [ true ⇒ (i1 ◂ (bcast ? i2)) + | false ⇒ 〈i1 · i2,false〉 + ] + ]. + +definition lift ≝ λS.λf:pitem S →pre S.λe:pre S. + match e with + [ mk_Prod i b ⇒ 〈\fst (f i), \snd (f i) ∨ b〉]. + +notation "a ▸ b" left associative with precedence 60 for @{'lc eclose $a $b}. +interpretation "lc" 'lc op a b = (lc ? op a b). + +definition lk ≝ λS:DeqSet.λbcast:∀S:DeqSet.∀E:pitem S.pre S.λe:pre S. + match e with + [ mk_Prod i1 b1 ⇒ + match b1 with + [true ⇒ 〈(\fst (bcast ? i1))^*, true〉 + |false ⇒ 〈i1^*,false〉 + ] + ]. + +(* notation < "a \sup ⊛" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'lk $op $a}.*) +interpretation "lk" 'lk op a = (lk ? op a). +notation "a^⊛" non associative with precedence 90 for @{'lk eclose $a}. + +notation "•" non associative with precedence 60 for @{eclose ?}. + +let rec eclose (S: DeqSet) (i: pitem S) on i : pre S ≝ + match i with + [ pz ⇒ 〈 `∅, false 〉 + | pe ⇒ 〈 ϵ, true 〉 + | ps x ⇒ 〈 `.x, false〉 + | pp x ⇒ 〈 `.x, false 〉 + | po i1 i2 ⇒ •i1 ⊕ •i2 + | pc i1 i2 ⇒ •i1 ▸ i2 + | pk i ⇒ 〈(\fst (•i))^*,true〉]. + +notation "• x" non associative with precedence 60 for @{'eclose $x}. +interpretation "eclose" 'eclose x = (eclose ? x). + +lemma eclose_plus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + •(i1 + i2) = •i1 ⊕ •i2. +// qed. + +lemma eclose_dot: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + •(i1 · i2) = •i1 ▸ i2. +// qed. + +lemma eclose_star: ∀S:DeqSet.∀i:pitem S. + •i^* = 〈(\fst(•i))^*,true〉. +// qed. + +definition reclose ≝ λS. lift S (eclose S). +interpretation "reclose" 'eclose x = (reclose ? x). + +(* theorem 16: 2 *) +lemma sem_oplus: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1,e2:pre S. + \sem{e1 ⊕ e2} =1 \sem{e1} ∪ \sem{e2}. +#S * #i1 #b1 * #i2 #b2 #w % + [cases b1 cases b2 normalize /2/ * /3/ * /3/ + |cases b1 cases b2 normalize /2/ * /3/ * /3/ + ] +qed. + +lemma odot_true : + ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + 〈i1,true〉 ▸ i2 = i1 ◂ (•i2). +// qed. + +lemma odot_true_bis : + ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + 〈i1,true〉 ▸ i2 = 〈i1 · \fst (•i2), \snd (•i2)〉. +#S #i1 #i2 normalize cases (•i2) // qed. + +lemma odot_false: + ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + 〈i1,false〉 ▸ i2 = 〈i1 · i2, false〉. +// qed. + +lemma LcatE : ∀S.∀e1,e2:pitem S. + \sem{e1 · e2} = \sem{e1} · \sem{|e2|} ∪ \sem{e2}. +// qed. + +lemma erase_dot : ∀S.∀e1,e2:pitem S. |e1 · e2| = c ? (|e1|) (|e2|). +// qed. + +lemma erase_plus : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S. + |i1 + i2| = |i1| + |i2|. +// qed. + +lemma erase_star : ∀S.∀i:pitem S.|i^*| = |i|^*. +// qed. + +lemma erase_bull : ∀S.∀i:pitem S. |\fst (•i)| = |i|. +#S #i elim i // + [ #i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >erase_dot eclose_dot + cases (•i1) #i11 #b1 cases b1 // odot_true_bis // + | #i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_plus >(erase_plus … i1) eclose_star >(erase_star … i) odot_false >sem_pre_false >sem_pre_false >sem_cat /2/ + |#H >odot_true >sem_pre_true @(eqP_trans … (sem_pre_concat_r …)) + >erase_bull @eqP_trans [|@(eqP_union_l … H)] + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_l[|@union_comm ]] + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_sym @union_assoc ] /3/ + ] +qed. + +lemma sem_fst: ∀S.∀e:pre S. \sem{\fst e} =1 \sem{e}-{[ ]}. +#S * #i * + [>sem_pre_true normalize in ⊢ (??%?); #w % + [/3/ | * * // #H1 #H2 @False_ind @(absurd …H1 H2)] + |>sem_pre_false normalize in ⊢ (??%?); #w % [ /3/ | * // ] + ] +qed. + +lemma item_eps: ∀S.∀i:pitem S. \sem{i} =1 \sem{i}-{[ ]}. +#S #i #w % + [#H whd % // normalize @(not_to_not … (not_epsilon_lp …i)) // + |* // + ] +qed. + +lemma sem_fst_aux: ∀S.∀e:pre S.∀i:pitem S.∀A. + \sem{e} =1 \sem{i} ∪ A → \sem{\fst e} =1 \sem{i} ∪ (A - {[ ]}). +#S #e #i #A #seme +@eqP_trans [|@sem_fst] +@eqP_trans [||@eqP_union_r [|@eqP_sym @item_eps]] +@eqP_trans [||@distribute_substract] +@eqP_substract_r // +qed. + +(* theorem 16: 1 *) +theorem sem_bull: ∀S:DeqSet. ∀e:pitem S. \sem{•e} =1 \sem{e} ∪ \sem{|e|}. +#S #e elim e + [#w normalize % [/2/ | * //] + |/2/ + |#x normalize #w % [ /2/ | * [@False_ind | //]] + |#x normalize #w % [ /2/ | * // ] + |#i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_dot + @eqP_trans [|@odot_dot_aux //] >sem_cat + @eqP_trans + [|@eqP_union_r + [|@eqP_trans [|@(cat_ext_l … IH1)] @distr_cat_r]] + @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] + @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc] + @eqP_union_l // + |#i1 #i2 #IH1 #IH2 >eclose_plus + @eqP_trans [|@sem_oplus] >sem_plus >erase_plus + @eqP_trans [|@(eqP_union_l … IH2)] + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_sym @union_assoc] + @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] @eqP_union_r + @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc] + @eqP_trans [||@eqP_union_l [|@union_comm]] + @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] /2/ + |#i #H >sem_pre_true >sem_star >erase_bull >sem_star + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@cat_ext_l [|@sem_fst_aux //]]] + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@distr_cat_r]] + @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] @eqP_union_l >erase_star + @eqP_sym @star_fix_eps + ] +qed. + +definition lifted_cat ≝ λS:DeqSet.λe:pre S. + lift S (lc S eclose e). + +notation "e1 ⊙ e2" left associative with precedence 70 for @{'odot $e1 $e2}. + +interpretation "lifted cat" 'odot e1 e2 = (lifted_cat ? e1 e2). + +lemma odot_true_b : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b. + 〈i1,true〉 ⊙ 〈i2,b〉 = 〈i1 · (\fst (•i2)),\snd (•i2) ∨ b〉. +#S #i1 #i2 #b normalize in ⊢ (??%?); cases (•i2) // +qed. + +lemma odot_false_b : ∀S.∀i1,i2:pitem S.∀b. + 〈i1,false〉 ⊙ 〈i2,b〉 = 〈i1 · i2 ,b〉. +// +qed. + +lemma erase_odot:∀S.∀e1,e2:pre S. + |\fst (e1 ⊙ e2)| = |\fst e1| · (|\fst e2|). +#S * #i1 * * #i2 #b2 // >odot_true_b // +qed. + +lemma ostar_true: ∀S.∀i:pitem S. + 〈i,true〉^⊛ = 〈(\fst (•i))^*, true〉. +// qed. + +lemma ostar_false: ∀S.∀i:pitem S. + 〈i,false〉^⊛ = 〈i^*, false〉. +// qed. + +lemma erase_ostar: ∀S.∀e:pre S. + |\fst (e^⊛)| = |\fst e|^*. +#S * #i * // qed. + +lemma sem_odot_true: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1:pre S.∀i. + \sem{e1 ⊙ 〈i,true〉} =1 \sem{e1 ▸ i} ∪ { [ ] }. +#S #e1 #i +cut (e1 ⊙ 〈i,true〉 = 〈\fst (e1 ▸ i), \snd(e1 ▸ i) ∨ true〉) [//] +#H >H cases (e1 ▸ i) #i1 #b1 cases b1 + [>sem_pre_true @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @union_assoc] + @eqP_union_l /2/ + |/2/ + ] +qed. + +lemma eq_odot_false: ∀S:DeqSet.∀e1:pre S.∀i. + e1 ⊙ 〈i,false〉 = e1 ▸ i. +#S #e1 #i +cut (e1 ⊙ 〈i,false〉 = 〈\fst (e1 ▸ i), \snd(e1 ▸ i) ∨ false〉) [//] +cases (e1 ▸ i) #i1 #b1 cases b1 #H @H +qed. + +lemma sem_odot: + ∀S.∀e1,e2: pre S. \sem{e1 ⊙ e2} =1 \sem{e1}· \sem{|\fst e2|} ∪ \sem{e2}. +#S #e1 * #i2 * + [>sem_pre_true + @eqP_trans [|@sem_odot_true] + @eqP_trans [||@union_assoc] @eqP_union_r @odot_dot_aux // + |>sem_pre_false >eq_odot_false @odot_dot_aux // + ] +qed. + +(* theorem 16: 4 *) +theorem sem_ostar: ∀S.∀e:pre S. + \sem{e^⊛} =1 \sem{e} · \sem{|\fst e|}^*. +#S * #i #b cases b + [>sem_pre_true >sem_pre_true >sem_star >erase_bull + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r[|@cat_ext_l [|@sem_fst_aux //]]] + @eqP_trans [|@eqP_union_r [|@distr_cat_r]] + @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @distr_cat_r] + @eqP_trans [|@union_assoc] @eqP_union_l + @eqP_trans [||@eqP_sym @epsilon_cat_l] @eqP_sym @star_fix_eps + |>sem_pre_false >sem_pre_false >sem_star /2/ + ] +qed. + diff --git a/weblib/tutorial/chapter6.ma b/weblib/tutorial/chapter6.ma new file mode 100644 index 000000000..58e349509 --- /dev/null +++ b/weblib/tutorial/chapter6.ma @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +include "basics/logic.ma". + +(* Given a universe A, we can consider sets of elements of type A by means of their +characteristic predicates A → Prop. *) + +definition set ≝ λA:Type[0].A → Prop. + +(* For instance, the empty set is the set defined by an always False predicate *) + +definition empty : ∀A.a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A ≝ λA.λa:A.a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/False.ind(1,0,0)"False/a. + +(* the singleton set {a} can be defined by the characteristic predicate stating +equality with a *) + +definition singleton: ∀A.A → a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A ≝ λA.λa,x.aa title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/ax. + +(* Complement, union and intersection are easily defined, by means of logical +connectives *) + +definition complement: ∀A. a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A → a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A ≝ λA,P,x.a title="logical not" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"¬/a(P x). + +definition intersection: ∀A. a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A → a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A → a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A ≝ λA,P,Q,x.(P x) a title="logical and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/a (Q x). + +definition union: ∀A. a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A → a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A → a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/chapter4/set.def(1)"set/a A ≝ λA,P,Q,x.(P x) a title="logical or" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∨/a (Q x). + + + + + + + + (* The reader could probably wonder what is the difference between Prop and bool. +In fact, they are quite distinct entities. In type theory, all objects are structured +in a three levels hierarchy + t : A : s +where, t is a term, A is a type, and s is called a sort. Sorts are special, primitive +constants used to give a type to types. Now, Prop is a primitive sort, while bool is +just a user defined data type (whose sort his Type[0]). In particular, Prop is the +sort of Propositions: its elements are logical statements in the usual sense. The important +point is that statements are inhabited by their proofs: a triple of the kind + p : Q : Prop +should be read as p is a proof of the proposition Q.*) + + + +include "arithmetics/nat.ma". +include "basics/list.ma". + +interpretation "iff" 'iff a b = (iff a b). + +record Alpha : Type[1] ≝ { carr :> Type[0]; + eqb: carr → carr → a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.ind(1,0,0)"bool/a; + eqb_true: ∀x,y. (eqb x y a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a a href="cic:/matita/basics/bool/bool.con(0,1,0)"true/a) a title="iff" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"↔/a (x a title="leibnitz's equality" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"=/a y) +}. + +notation "a == b" non associative with precedence 45 for @{ 'eqb $a $b }. +interpretation "eqb" 'eqb a b = (eqb ? a b). + +definition word ≝ λS:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/Alpha.ind(1,0,0)"Alpha/a.a href="cic:/matita/basics/list/list.ind(1,0,1)"list/a S. + +inductive re (S: a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/Alpha.ind(1,0,0)"Alpha/a) : Type[0] ≝ + z: re S + | e: re S + | s: S → re S + | c: re S → re S → re S + | o: re S → re S → re S + | k: re S → re S. + +notation < "a \sup ⋇" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pk $a}. +notation > "a ^ *" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'pk $a}. +interpretation "star" 'pk a = (k ? a). +interpretation "or" 'plus a b = (o ? a b). + +notation "a · b" non associative with precedence 60 for @{ 'pc $a $b}. +interpretation "cat" 'pc a b = (c ? a b). + +(* to get rid of \middot +coercion c : ∀S:Alpha.∀p:re S. re S → re S ≝ c on _p : re ? to ∀_:?.?. *) + +notation < "a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}. +notation > "` term 90 a" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'ps $a}. +interpretation "atom" 'ps a = (s ? a). + +notation "ϵ" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'epsilon }. +interpretation "epsilon" 'epsilon = (e ?). + +notation "∅" non associative with precedence 90 for @{ 'empty }. +interpretation "empty" 'empty = (z ?). + +let rec flatten (S : a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/Alpha.ind(1,0,0)"Alpha/a) (l : a href="cic:/matita/basics/list/list.ind(1,0,1)"list/a (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/word.def(3)"word/a S)) on l : a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/word.def(3)"word/a S ≝ +match l with [ nil ⇒ a title="nil" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"[/a ] | cons w tl ⇒ w a title="append" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"@/a flatten ? tl ]. + +let rec conjunct (S : a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/Alpha.ind(1,0,0)"Alpha/a) (l : a href="cic:/matita/basics/list/list.ind(1,0,1)"list/a (a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/word.def(3)"word/a S)) (r : a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/word.def(3)"word/a S → Prop) on l: Prop ≝ +match l with [ nil ⇒ a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/True.ind(1,0,0)"True/a | cons w tl ⇒ r w a title="logical and" href="cic:/fakeuri.def(1)"∧/a conjunct ? tl r ]. + +definition empty_lang ≝ λS.λw:a href="cic:/matita/tutorial/re/word.def(3)"word/a S.a href="cic:/matita/basics/logic/False.ind(1,0,0)"False/a. +notation "{}" non associative with precedence 90 f \ No newline at end of file